Politics – March-April 2023 – Israel On The Defensive Against Its Own Government
Democracy should not be taken for granted. It should be fought for.
Government that ignores its people is doomed to fail, is doomed to fall.
Those who sow hatred should not be surprised to see hatred and to face hatred. Hatred is other- and self-destructive.
If you want to know the discourse at the home of the Netanyahus, listen to their highly intelligent and informed son Yair.
§ Raphael Cohen-Almagor
Netanyahu dreads jail. It is personal. It is all about him. To evade justice, Netanyahu is prepared to destroy democracy, incite and divide the country.
The key to understand what is going on in Israel is: Netanyahu wants to evade justice. Many of the laws concern him directly. Yariv and Rotman are in the front line. They deliver. The mastermind behind them and tells them what to do is Netanyahu.
In his early days in politics during the 1990s, Netanyahu exhibited the “qualities” that made him the King of Israel in the eyes of his supporters: ability to set ends, map situations, having no qualms reaching them, pragmatism or, more correctly, having no backbone. Master of words and manipulation, Netanyahu was behind the incitement campaign against Prime Minister Rabin that ended on 4 November 1995, with Rabin’s assassination.
In the early 2000s, Netanyahu faced Ariel Sharon, another master of manipulation, little qualms, with greater experience in politics, competing in Netanyahu’s own camp. Netanyahu was forced to move aside. He regrouped, striving to take the party from Sharon. Sharon saw what was going on. In a master stroke, he left the Likud and established Kadima, trusting that his popularity exceeded Netanyahu’s. Sharon was right.
But then Sharon suffered two strokes that brought Olmert to power. The latter’s mistakes paved the way to Netanyahu’s return to power. 2009 denotes the beginning of the Netanyahu’s era. His heydays as Netanyahu faced no real competition. He consolidated his power, crafted populism by taking control over chanks of the media, established his political agenda and took over the Likud party, ousting his rivals or buying them. But then Netanyahu faced his greatest enemy: his own personality. Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Netanyahu lacks morality and backbone. With a growing sense of power, he allowed himself to do more and more things that a moral person would not consider doing. His mistakes brought him to face the law.
For years, Netanyahu said: There was nothing. There is nothing. There will be nothing. He trusted that the shields he has built around him, including the appointment of the Legal Advisor to the Government (Attorney General), would protect him. But Avichai Mandelblit’s loyalty is first and foremost to the law. Mandelblit took his time. He did not rush. He would press charges against the prime minister if, and only if, there was ample evidence against Netanyahu. Nothing below 100% case would convince him to go ahead. Until he got his 100%. Then he decided to press charges. Netanyahu stopped saying: There was nothing. There is nothing. There will be nothing. Now it was time for action.
To protect himself, Netanyahu sought to secure 61 Knesset members that would support him in legislating the needed laws that would keep him out of jail. Netanyahu drove the country to four elections campaigns in search of Knesset majority. He failed time after time but there was too much at stake for the relentless Netanyahu to give up. He drove Smotrich, Ben-Gvir and Avi Maoz to run together. Yair Lapid, Merav Michaeli, Zehava Galon and Ahmed Tibi made tragic mistakes and Netanyahu got what he wanted: a solid coalition. The legislation blitz has started.
Many of the laws are personal. They directly concern Netanyahu. The immunity law. The presents’ law. The law to change the Supreme Court. The law to change the seniority norm in the Supreme Court. They are all designed to see that when Netanyahu will face the Supreme Court, the judges on his trial will keep him out of jail.
And then there are Netanyahu’s partners who jumped on the wagon to advance their own aims. In the first three months of the Knesset, 2,910 private law proposals were tabled together with 27 government law proposals. Five more legislative proposals were tabled by the Knesset committees. Those proposals politicise procedures, are self-serving, theocratic, discriminatory and on the verge of science fiction due to their blunt hutzpah, lack of judgement, lack of research, and their anti-democratic character. Due to lack of space, I will not review all of them. I want to highlight some of the most problematic proposals.
Corrupt Laws
Prime Minister immunity: The prime minister can be declared unfit to perform his/her role only due to physical or mental incapacity. Criminal charges or criminal convictions cannot be grounds to declare the prime minister unfit. Prime Minister Netanyahu is facing several severe criminal charges against him.
Barring criminal investigations against the Prime Minister as long as he/she is serving in office.
Ministers and deputy ministers could be barred from office due to criminal charges against them only by the Knesset, instead of the Supreme Court as is the case now.
Furthermore, the Supreme Court could not intervene in appointment of ministers. A senior minister and leader of the Shas Party, Arieh Deri, is a convicted felon who wishes to serve in the government.
Deputy Director Generals of ministries would cease to be professional appointments. Other law proposals are to enable people without appropriate qualifications to serve in governmental companies as directors and in other senior positions. Politicians will be able to appoint their loyal servants.
Public officials will be able to receive donations for legal defence and for emergency medical treatments. This proposal is tailored for Netanyahu. One of the charges against him relate to acceptance of gifts in return for favours.
Legal Advisors of ministries will be appointed by the ministers. They will become trusted officials of the ministers in charge and report to the minister instead of reporting to the Legal Advisor to the Government.
The Legal Advisor to the Government and the State Attorney will be appointed by the government without a need for tender, as is the case now.
The Department of police investigations will be taken from the Office of the State Attorney and will be under the Minister of Justice who will be able to appoint the Head of the Department.
Laws designed to weaken the police and its independence
The Minister of Internal Police will be able to decide police policies including the investigations’ policy.
Key functions within the police will be transferred to the responsibility of The Minister of Internal Police.
Laws to provide immunity to security forces
Immunity will be given to all security people during security operations.
The Department of Police Investigations would not be able to investigate officers involved in preventing terrorism and other threats to national security.
The drafters of those short-sighted laws fail to understand that the enactment of the laws would open a flood of petitions to international courts to investigate misconduct.
Laws that undermine basic human rights
The police could use advance photographic technology to monitor civilian activity and invade privacy.
At the same time, the MKs’ immunity laws would be expanded to prevent searching their (and their assistants’) smart phones and computers.
Discriminatory laws
Shabac would receive authorization to monitor and act against serious criminal activity, “especially in the Arab society”.
Anti-Democratic laws
Only persons who are directly affected by certain policy could appeal to the Supreme Court. NGOs would not be able to do so.
Civil rights organisations would be barred from documenting human rights violations, e.g. documenting soldiers who harass Palestinians in the Occupied Territories.
Barring demonstrations near private homes of public officials.
Three-year imprisonment to those who block roads, e.g. protestors against the government anti-democratic laws.
One-year imprisonment to three people or more who wave together enemy flags.
Three-year imprisonment and a fine of at least 5,000 NIS for waving the Palestinian flag.
Supporters of banning Israel would not be eligible to State prizes.
Those convicted for violating the Israeli flag or symbols would not receive national welfare.
Theocratic laws
Study of Torah would be equated, for the purpose of granting benefits, to serving in security forces.
Barring flour and its products in hospitals and IDF bases during Passover.
Rabbinical courts would be able to decide on civic matters.
Rabbis would not be liable to criminal proceedings if they voice halachic opinions on any matters relating to the Torah. This, effectively, would enable rabbis to incite against whoever is considered to be “an enemy”.
Barring support to religious people who wish to become secular.
Judicial revolution
The number of Supreme Court justices will be raised from 15 to 18. Three new justices would be appointed by the government now, with immediate effect.
The composition of the Committee that appoints judges will be changed, giving the government the majority to decide all appointments. The Supreme Court justices who serve on the Committee would no longer have a veto power over appointments.
The Supreme Court would be able to overrule laws only in its sitting in full, with all justices present, with only unanimous vote.
The President of the Supreme Court would be appointed by the government and confirmed by the Knesset. The Seniority norm would no longer be in existence. The President does not have to be a justice of the Supreme Court.
Chair of the Elections Central Committee would not be a Justice of the Supreme Court, as is now, but would be recommended by the Speaker of the Knesset.
Laws undermining academic freedom
Students who support violence against Israel, terror organisations or the Palestinian Authority would not be able to study and receive academic degrees.
Academic institutions that cooperate with institutions that negate Israel as a Jewish-democracy, call to investigate soldiers, support the BDS or incite against Israel would be penalised by reducing their budgets.
Universities should not allow the waving of the Palestinian flag in their midst. Academic institution that would not abide by the rules would be penalised by deducting 10% of its budget. Students and staff who wave the Palestinian flag would be suspended for six months for the first violation, and altogether if they do so again.
Academic institutions that would not fly the Israeli flag would deny government support.
Institutions whose employees support activities that negate the values of the State would be penalised financially.
Capital punishment
Automatic capital punishment to convicted terrorists.
There is no doubt that the consequences will be harsh: lack of checks and balances, reducing the judicial system, hurting minorities, discriminating against women, pushing for annexation of Area C, increasing violence against Palestinians, and making peace a remote dream. Netanyahu, Deri and other corrupt people will not be touched, serving their constituents above the law. Israel as we know it is becoming, in front of our eyes, authoritarian, corrupt and theocratic.
This government says that if they were elected democratically, then they can do whatever they want, as if the judiciary does not count as long as it is not in accordance with their political views. They are continuously saying “The Supreme Court was not elected by the people. We were. Therefore, we have the last word”. Their understanding of democracy and justice is a mockery of the rule of law. It is most worrying to hear some lawyers speaking like this. Unlike Mandelblit, once they assumed the politicians’ role, they forgot the basic principles of law.
Do not stand idly by. Act now, before it is too late. Evil triumph when silence prevails.
Reflections on Last Newsletter
NATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY NOW!
Saudi Arabia and Iran
Freedom of Expression in the United Kingdom
Owahuuuu!!!! Scientists create mice with two fathers after making eggs from male cells
Football: Urgent Call
Israel Engaging four Muslim Nations to Join Abraham Accords
My Inaugural Lecture
New article: “Michael Walzer’s Just War Theory and the 1982 Israel War in Lebanon: Theory and Application”, Israel Studies, 27(3) (2022): 166-189.
Best books about medical ethics and end-of-life
Gem of the Month - Malmo
Gem of the Month – Helsingborg
Monthly Poem
Reflections on Last Newsletter
Hearty thanks for all readers who send their congratulations on my Olof Palme Professorship. I appreciate your kind words.
Many sent me comments about what is happening in Israel in Hebrew. If you wish me to consider including your statements, please send them in English.
I will not include ignorant statements, half-truths, stupid statements and words that are hateful and inciteful. The level of hatred in Israel nowadays reminds me of the post-Oslo dark days. Only now, the violence is shared by all camps.
Time to reflect and think what kind of society the people of Israel want. If this government will not be stopped, the future of Israel will be bleak. It will be autocratic, Halachic, anti-democratic, violent, discriminatory, unjust and dark. It will be the Jewish version of Iran.
Major General Uzi Dayan sent me the following:
NATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY NOW!
Israel, in its eighth decade of existence, is a creative, resilient and thriving society. Throughout its years, the state has faced and weathered serious challenges both from within and from external sources. This ability to persevere emanated from the strength and resilience of its society. This resilience was based on the recognition that partnership and mutual responsibility were stronger and superior to the differences from within.
Israeli society is full of divisions, be they related to religion and state, policy issues, ethnicity, Arab-Jewish relations or socio-economic gaps. These cleavages have existed virtually since the founding of the state. Despite these sources of strife, Israelis have always joined together and closed ranks.
However, the eighth decade harbors new dangers. Looking at history, we discover countries which encountered deep social strife that endangered their very existence. It happened twice in the ancient kingdoms of Israel, to the kingdom of King Solomon and later to the Hashmoneans, both of which were torn apart during the eighth decade of rule.
The underlying reason for it is that one side constantly feels that it is making concessions on behalf of unity, while the other sees the prosperous state as a given. Israel has been in an unprecedented political crisis these past three years, which has raised questions of identity and other sources of division and strife in Israeli society. On top of this, the political crisis revolving around judicial reform has given birth to a deep social crisis, splitting Israelis into two camps: pro-reform and anti-reform. The situation has been exacerbated by many extreme, divisive statements which accentuate the widespread cleavages. The resultant feelings are further exacerbated by the fact that no serious efforts are being made to reach a resolution.
We, who have been among those at the forefront of safeguarding Israel`s security through shaping and implementing it, are deeply concerned about the intensity of this conflict, which is jeopardizing Israel`s resilience.
The responsibility for Israel`s resilience and unity rests first and foremost on the shoulder of the Knesset, the legislative body representing the people. We therefore call on the heads of the Coalition and Opposition to immediately enter unconditionally into serious talks leading to a mutually agreed upon resolution of the relationship between the three bodies – legislative, executive and judicial.
Only an agreement reached by the elected representatives of the people will reinforce Israel`s internal resilience and will serve as undisputed proof to all that Israel is a strong, flourishing state bolstered by its deeply ingrained sense of mutual responsibility.
Former Heads of the National Security Council (in order of service): Maj.Gen.(res.) David Ivri, Maj.Gen.(res.) Gideon Shefer, Maj.Gen.(res.) Uzi Dayan, Maj.Gen.(res.) Giora Eiland, Ilan Mizrahi, Brig.Gen.(res.) Dan Arditi, Prof. Uzi Arad, Maj.Gen.(res.) Yaacov Amidror, Yossi Cohen, Bri.Gen.(res.) Prof. Yacov Nagel, Eitan Ben David, Dr. Eyal Hulata.
Saudi Arabia and Iran
Instead of having a push towards establishing relationships with Saudi Arabia, Israeli government witnessing Saudi Arabia restoring relations with Iran. This is a major blow to all who yearn to see tranquility in Israel, ending the Israeli occupation and installing peace between Israel and all its neighbours. The key to Israel’s security and existence is its acceptance in the Middle East as a legitimate country.
Freedom of Expression in the United Kingdom
Gary Lineker is a mensch. He was a great sportsman, a model to follow. He became the face of British football in his position as the Match of The Day presenter. Lineker speaks when he sees evil. He thinks that British policies regarding refugees is unjust and awful. He says what he thinks. The British government and freedom of expression have problematic relationships. They pressed the BBC to do something to stop Lineker. The BBC, fearing for its continued funding, suspended Lineker. Very worrying times for British democracy.
Owahuuuu!!!! Scientists create mice with two fathers after making eggs from male cells
Creation of mammal with two biological fathers could pave way for new fertility treatments in humans
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2023/mar/08/scientists-create-mice-with-two-fathers-after-making-eggs-from-male-cells?utm_term=640967d7f5fc48858d002472890f067a&utm_campaign=GuardianTodayUK&utm_source=esp&utm_medium=Email&CMP=GTUK_email
Football: Urgent Call
Footballers should wear special protective helmets to avoid head injuries and greater potential for dementia and brain damage. The head needs to be protected more than any other part of the body and, at present, it is totally exposed. Long-term effects might be substantial, especially for tall players who head the ball more than others.
Israel Engaging four Muslim Nations to Join Abraham Accords
Israeli newspapers say that Israeli Foreign Minister Eli Cohen was working to normalize ties with Mauritania, Somalia, Niger, and Indonesia. Negotiations with Mauritania are in the advanced state, as Cohen hinted in a meeting with German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock, during which he officially asked her help vis-a-vis Mauritania and Niger. Israel and Mauritania used to have diplomatic relations – established in 1999 – but cut ties in 2008 due to the Gaza war. Israel and Somalia have never had diplomatic ties. Israel is interested due to Somalia's important strategic location between the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean at the entrance to the Red Sea. Israel is also interested in normalizing ties with Niger as it is a global supplier of uranium, and its ties to Israel might prevent the sale of the material to hostile countries and reduce the number of nations voting against Israel in international forums. Cohen is also working to normalize ties with Indonesia, the biggest Muslim country in the world.
My Inaugural Lecture
Earlier this month I delivered my Inaugural Lecture. It was a memorable day. We headed to the auditorium at 14:30. The event was opened with short speeches by Professor Karin Aggestam, Director of the Centre for Advanced Middle Eastern Studies, Lund University, Professor Per Mickwitz, Pro Vice-Chancellor of Lund University, and Professor Stefan Svallfors, Secretary General of the Swedish Research Council. Then I delivered the Olof Palme Inaugural Lecture, discussing some of theories I developed during my career.
Lund invited twenty-five people for dinner at the beautiful Bishop House to celebrate the occasion. My wife and I returned to our apartment just before 22:00. It was a long and exciting day.
New article: “Michael Walzer’s Just War Theory and the 1982 Israel War in Lebanon: Theory and Application”, Israel Studies, 27(3) (2022): 166-189.
Abstract:
The article draws on Michael Walzer's just war theory to assess the conduct of the Lebanon War of 1982 (Operation Peace for Galilee) and argues that according to the underpinning principles of Walzer's theory, it was an unjust war. Sharon's war plans, codenamed "Grand Oranim," were designed to relieve the Lebanese Christian militias of their so-called Palestinian burden by driving the refugees into Jordan where they would presumably bring about a regime change and turn Jordan into a Palestinian state. My analysis focuses on the causes of this war, jus ad bellum, whether it was a war of self-defense, and the means that were employed in its conduct, its jus in bello. Likewise explored and analyzed here are the concepts of proportionality and the treatment of non-combatants.
Keywords: First Lebanon War, Operation Peace for Galilee, Israel, Just war, Unjust war, Lebanon, Michael Walzer, Menachem Begin, Ariel Sharon, PLO, Phalange, Manipulation, Aggression, Security, Syria.
The best books about medical ethics and end-of-life
https://shepherd.com/best-books/medical-ethics-and-end-of-life
By Raphael Cohen-Almagor
Who am I?
Raphael Cohen-Almagor, DPhil, St. Catherine’s College, University of Oxford, is Professor of Politics, Olof Palme Visiting Professor, Lund University, Founding Director of the Middle East Study Centre, University of Hull, and Global Fellow, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Raphael taught, inter alia, at Oxford (UK), Jerusalem, Haifa (Israel), UCLA, Johns Hopkins (USA), and Nirma University (India). With more than 300 publications, Raphael has published extensively in the field of political philosophy, including Liberal Democracy and the Limits of Tolerance; Challenges to Democracy; The Right to Die with Dignity; The Scope of Tolerance; Confronting the Internet's Dark Side; Just, Reasonable Multiculturalism, and The Republic, Secularism and Security: France versus the Burqa and the Niqab.
I wrote...
The Right to Die with Dignity: An Argument in Ethics, Medicine, and Law
By Raphael Cohen-Almagor
What is my book about?
This is one of my major books, the product of ten years of research in the United Kingdom, Israel, Canada, the United States, Australia, New Zealand, and The Netherlands.
It's based on intensive fieldwork conducted in libraries, hospitals, and medical centers, involving in-depth interviews with dozens of professionals around the patient’s bed as well as with patients and their families. This interdisciplinary study in medicine, law, and ethics covers a wide range of theoretical and practical issues concerning end of life that physicians, nurses, ethicists, and scientists confront time and again. The book considers the philosophical difficulties inherent in the concepts of medical ethics, but, at the same time, it's not confined strictly to the philosophical realm. It argues for physician-assisted suicide performed under strict regulation designed to prevent potential abuse.
Shepherd is reader supported.
We may earn an affiliate commission when you buy through links on our website. This is how we fund the project for readers and authors. Please join our membership program to support our endeavor.
The books I picked & why
Principles of Biomedical Ethics
By Tom L. Beauchamp, James F. Childress
Why this book?
This is a classic book.
It is probably the most influential book in the field of medical ethics since the field was established during the 1960s.
I use this book and its invoked Georgetown Mantra of Bioethics, which includes the principles of beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice, in all my medical ethics courses, and refer to this book often when I'm writing about medical ethics and end-of-life concerns.
Its guiding principles are relevant today as they were when the book was written.
I invited Tom Beauchamp to one of the conferences I organised. Tom subsequently contributed a chapter to my edited volume Medical Ethics at the Dawn of the 21st Century (New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 2000), Vol. 913 of the Annals.
He also invited me to present my book at the Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University. When I was teaching at Johns Hopkins I also enjoyed meeting his life partner, Ruth Faden, who is also a brilliant medical ethicist.
Explore this book
For the Patient's Good: The Restoration of Beneficence in Health Care
By Edmund D. Pellegrino, David C. Thomasma
Why this book?
Edmund (Ed) D. Pellegrino was a man of many qualities and achievements.
He was one of the forefathers of medical ethics. He was a learned Catholic. He was hailed as a “complete physician” among “a handful of other high-profile physician leaders of the twentieth century.
In a long and remarkable career that spanned over 55 years of research and scholarship, Pellegrino published more than 550 scholarly books and articles.
In For the Patient's Good, the authors discuss the notion of beneficence as a guiding principle in medical ethics. They examine the content of the concept of 'patient good' from ethical, philosophical, and practical aspects, speaking about the duties of the medical professionals to their patients.
Ed and I used to meet during my visits to Washington. We had lengthy conversations about medical ethics, philosophy, religion (Catholicism, Judaism), and education.
He was the keynote speaker in one of the conferences I organised. I greatly appreciated him. We kept in touch up until his death in 2013.
Explore this book
Setting Limits: Medical Goals in an Aging Society with "A Response to My Critics"
By Daniel Callahan
Why this book?
Like Pellegrino, Daniel (Dan) Callahan is also one of the forefathers of the field of medical ethics.
A prolific author, Dan published 47 books and some 800 articles and blogs. Dan is also the co-founder of the Hastings Center in New York, one of the leading research centers on medical ethics in the world. In many ways, his vision established medical ethics as a legitimate field of studies.
In Setting Limits, Callahan suggests the concept of a “full biographical life span,” meaning the point at which it can be said that a person has lived a complete, fulfilling, whole life. He does not determine a specific age but suggests a range — late seventies, early eighties, which in his opinion is equivalent to a natural, complete life cycle.
Callahan claims that today medical technology can extend life beyond the point that he believes is sensible and worthwhile. He deliberates what can be done to avoid such a result.
I was fortunate to visit the Hastings Center twice, in 1994 and 1999. Dan and I fiercely and candidly debated his ideas, articulated in his books The Troubled Dream of Life, What Kind of Life, and Setting Limits, as well as my ideas discussed in the two books that I was writing at that time: The Right to Die with Dignity and Euthanasia in the Netherlands.
Although we did not share the same views on end of life, I always appreciated his wisdom and liked him as a person. I have consulted with Dan on some of my later projects, and the two of us kept in touch up until Dan’s death in 2019.
Explore this book
Life's Dominion: An Argument About Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedom
By Ronald Dworkin
Why this book?
In 1991, Dworkin taught at Oxford a seminar titled “Abortion, Euthanasia and Dementia”.
Until then, I never paid too much attention to these subjects, not more than any lay person with general knowledge. I attended the seminar simply because Dworkin delivered it.
This was the most interesting and thought-provoking seminar I have ever attended in my life. It opened my interest in medical ethics, a field that is still one of my preoccupations.
Dworkin was writing at that time Life’s Dominion. Each week he would circulate a chapter of his book, to be discussed in the following week.
We were some twelve students in class; each of us read and commented on the chapters. There was a very lively exchange and fierce debates.
Again, while I disagreed with some of Dworkin’s arguments, I could not but appreciate the force of his reasoning. After that seminar, I decided to embark on research on one of the three seminar themes: Euthanasia.
Life’s Dominion has become the center of some of my counter-arguments as Dworkin believed that euthanasia should also be granted for people who suffer from dementia whereas I oppose euthanasia and restrict acts that aim to shorten life to competent patients who voluntarily wish to end their lives.
Explore this book
By Emily Jackson, John Keown
Why this book?
The book brings together two contradictory viewpoints.
While Jackson argues that we should legalise assisted suicide in order to enable ‘good death’ and honour patients’ wishes, Keown opposes such a legislation, thinking that voluntary euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide are gravely unethical and what we need to do is to improve care, not to offer death.
This is an excellent exchange of ideas that I have used in my classes on end-of-life concerns.
John Keown and I meet in Washington every once and a while. Although we disagree on whether physician-assisted suicide should be offered, we agree on the need to preserve the dignity of the person as well as on many other fundamental issues.
I greatly appreciate John’s scholarship.
Explore this book
Gem of the Month - Malmo
Malmo is 15 minutes away from Lund by train. It is a port city, interesting and beautiful, with many places of interest. Malmö is the largest city in the Swedish county (län) of Scania (Skåne). It is the third-largest city in Sweden, after Stockholm and Gothenburg. Malmö was Danish until the 16th century. It is cheaper than Lund, and the population is more diverse. It seems more exciting than Copenhagen. We intend to explore it further.
Gem of the Month – Helsingborg
Helsingborg is a coastal city in southern Sweden, across the Øresund Strait from Denmark. It is Sweden's closest point to Denmark: the Danish city Helsingør is clearly visible about 4 km. It is about 25 minutes train ride from Lund, and it is known for its old town.
Monthly Poem
Simultaneously, I have been writing two books of poetry: one in Hebrew; the other in English. The book in Hebrew is titled Old News and now has 60 pages. The book in English is titled Between Love and Death and is now 92 pages long. I wish to publish both books and would very much appreciate pertinent constructive ideas.
Here is my weekly poem.
Anew
An enchanting smile climbs onto lips
Brighten sparkling eyes
In a pure glow
Difficult to match, match point.
Mask is down, soul is up
As enthralling words rush out
Like a train with a purpose
Climbing hills, dashing valleys
To conquer some more grounds.
As when it comes
Nothing could stop
The sun, the moon, the stars
The lush under pumping hearts
What there is, is today
Think about tomorrow, tomorrow.
Raphael Almagor
Peace and Good Health to you all
Rafi
My last communications with all the photos and illustrations are available on Israel: Democracy, Human Rights, Politics and Society, http://almagor.blogspot.com
People wishing to subscribe to this Monthly Newsletter are welcome to e-mail me at r.cohen-almagor@hull.ac.uk
Twitter at @almagor35
