Tuesday, June 22, 2010

Politics – June 2010



The real triumph of civilization is the extent to which coercion is banished from human relations.

                                 Anthony Gregory



Wise people avoid entering situations that all others stumble into and then struggle to exit.



The image and presentation of reality are sometimes more important than reality itself.



Gilad is still in captivity. Veshavu banim legvulam.



                                   Raphael Cohen-Almagor



This month was dominated by the Gaza flotilla. Dozens of people asked for a preview… This Blog provides a detailed account of this incident that is characteristic of Israel’s conduct nowadays. Unfortunately, it does not add to Israel's name and reputation in the world.



Every summer during the past few years, people (and the media) speculate that there will be war during the summer. Amazing. People all over the world prepare for their vacation. In Israel, the hot topic, appropriate for the weather, is war. As if there is nothing better to do. Now, why is that? Is this a reflection of our leadership? Something else? I am willing to hear suggestions.



One thing is sure. There won’t be war during the Mondial World Cup. May we have major sports tournaments each and every year, and make them long and engaging.

Reflections on May Blog


Gaza Flotilla


Insani Yardim Vakfi (IHH)


The Social-Economic Situation in Gaza


Praise for the Association for Civil Rights in Israel


The Enemy of My Former Friend Is Becoming My Friend


Iran


Britain’s Largest Academic Union Cuts Ties with Israel’s Histadrut


Privacy Conference


AICE Visiting Israel Professors


My Twitter


New Books


Movie


English Football


Wishes for the World Cup


Bye Bye Hull City


Monthly Poem


Light Side



Free Gilad Shalit. The government should invest in his release. It should be one of its top priorities. Veshavu banim legvulam.



Gilad Shalit



Reflections on May Blog


I opened my last Blog with the statement:


Probably, no nation is rich enough to pay for both war and civilization. We must make our choice; we cannot have both.                     
                                      Abraham Flexner


Ami Isseroff commented:


Hi,

Permit an observation. Sometimes an aphorism catches on because it "sounds right." When it is examined, it turns out to be untrue. And whenever we see a phenomenon that is opposed to common sense, there is something to explore.


No civilization ever existed for long without war, and no war took place without civilization. The Greeks, the Romans, the British, the French, the Germans, the Americans and the Chinese, the Persians, Babylonians and Assyrians, and of course, the Arabs all prove the thesis. Flexner was wrong.


Here is a book: Is War Civilization?

http://books.google.co.il/books?id=97pk3HV0EVMC

http://books.google.co.il/books?id=97pk3HV0EVMC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false


There are also earlier antecedents that I had in mind when I wrote the below. Ibn Khaldun, in his great "introduction" (Muqaddimah) described the theme of the desert vs the cities. It must be true for all civilizations. It has to mean that every civilization will constantly be challenged and will need to defend itself - until it is inevitably overrun.


There is also a counter-finding that savages warred too. Well yes they did, but they were bardakists most likely and couldn't get a really organized war going like the Romans or the Germans.

Regards,

Ami


Bert Keizer wrote:

Dear raphi


Thanks for your latest.



On the point of coalition politics: in Holland negotiations usually go on for months!


We all despise it, but parties want to enter into government with almost a blueprint for every issue that may crop up.


Thereby ignoring the liveliness of politics which Harold MacMillan beautifully expressed when asked what he was worried about in politics: 'Events, dear boy, events!'


Greetings from

bert


Gaza Flotilla


General Principle:

Israel is fighting a bitter war against a bitter enemy that does not recognise its right to exist. It is therefore justified to inspect the entry of merchandise into Gaza.


Why flotilla?

Two main reasons: Break the Israel blockade on Gaza, and PR for the Palestinians, and against Israel.


Two Important Milestones:

• In January 2006, Hamas won the Palestinian Authority's (PA) general legislative elections, defeating Fatah, the party of the PA's president, Mahmoud Abbas, and setting the stage for struggle and strife against Israel, and Fatah. Hamas does not recognize Israel. The State of Israel does not appear on its maps. It educates the children of Gaza to hatred, violence, and terror against the non-existing entity that captures Palestinian land. The democratically-elected government operates a terrorist wing, carried out many suicide bombings against Israeli soldiers and civilians. It also launched hundreds of rockets on Israeli towns whose misfortune is their proximity to the Gaza Strip. In Arabic, the word "hamas" means zeal. But it's also an Arabic acronym for "Harakat al-Muqawama al-Islamiya," or Islamic Resistance Movement. Hamas is born to resist.



• On Sunday morning (June 25, 2006) in the course of an infiltration and attack by terrorists in the area of Kibbutz Kerem Shalom, an IDF officer and a soldier were killed, a soldier was abducted, and four others were wounded. The abducted soldier is Gilad Shalit. I have been campaigning for his release during the past months.



Israel’s misguided policy was, still is, to suffocate Gaza. The belief, which defies history and is contrary to all that we know about the Palestinian people, holds that if we inflict more and more economic pressure on Gaza, the Gazans would become disillusioned with Hamas and opt for an alternative leadership. The further hope was that the pressure would facilitate the release of Gilad Shalit. Both hopes, at least until now, were not fulfilled. If at all, popular support for Hamas in Gaza (and the West Bank) has been on the rise, and Shalit is still in captivity, with little progress in bringing him home.


Policy:

Israel facilitates the daily passage of around 100 trucks a day of aid to Gaza through its land passage, arbitrarily restricting the types of goods it allows in. The most-sought after items in Gaza, such as cement, steel and other materials needed to rebuild the war-devastated Strip, are not permitted. “Luxury” goods, i.e., those beyond basic necessity such as soda, coriander, chocolate, juice, jam, spices, shaving cream, potato chips, cookies and candy were deemed gratuitous for the Gazans. Notebooks, blank paper, writing utensils and fishing rods are also excluded (potential rationale, I assume: “They are illiterate anyway!” “They should not kill our fish!”). Were Israel prudent in its blocking policy, targeting only things that could hamper its security, then there would have been no need for PR flotillas. Israel, by its own hands, brings about substantial damage on itself, and plays into the hands of its enemies. Israeli leaders do not differentiate between Hamas terrorists and Hamas voters. According to their infinite wisdom, they are all to blame for bringing Hamas to power and therefore they all should suffer the consequences of their poor behaviour.


From the General to the Particular:

The organization of this flotilla took many months. Six ships, 8,000 tons of aid, and 679 people from some 40 countries were involved. If Israel was determined that ships won't enter Gaza uninspected then it should have mounted a relentless and continuous campaign, on a week-by-week basis, convening repeated press briefings, explaining to the world what is at stake, why Israel cannot afford free movement to Gaza while offering different alternatives for resolving the expected conflict by peaceful means.


One possibility is to inspect the ships in their originating harbours and accompanying them to Israel. Another is to reach consent that the ships will be inspected at sea prior to offloading in Gaza, this provided is feasible to inspect the crates at sea. A third possibility, one that Israel did propose, is to inspect content in Israel. If all alternatives were to be declined, Israel should have explained that no inspection was not an option, and that the responsibility for conflict lay squarely with the flotilla organisers. A robust PR campaign should have accompanied the flotilla organization and movement. But Israel never believed in an effective PR campaign. If you don’t believe me, check the budgets that Israel embassies have for PR.


Source: BBC



Time and again, Israel finds itself with the need to explain after the event, deemed responsible, instead of explaining before the event, placing responsibility on provocateurs.


Furthermore, Israel should have conducted its own independent intelligence check on the flotilla and its organizers. Israel should have known that the organizers were not peace loving people who seek to avoid confrontation and conflict. Israel should have known that the Turkish Insani Yardim Vakfi (IHH), “Humanitarian Relief Fund” movement is a militant organization, with close links to violent movements, and that its members on the ships will resist an Israeli attempt to take over the ships (for further information about IHH, see below). Thus, it was a gross mistake on Israel’s part to deploy soldiers by helicopters on the ships’ decks. The soldiers were from the elite platoon Shayetet 13. Their conduct manifested the usual over-confidence so characteristic of elite platoons. All should know that you do not mess around with Shayetet 13. Someone forgot to tell this to the Turks on board.


The platoon’s officers apparently estimated that passengers will show slight resistance, and possibly minor violence. They were utterly wrong. The navy commandoes who slid down to the vessel one by one were easy targets for the awaiting passengers who attacked them, as soon as they came into their reach, with clubs, bats and polls. Quickly the situation had escalated as the commandoes were under threat to their lives. They opened fire. Nine passengers were killed. This situation should have been avoided from the start. A wise person avoids situations that others enter and then need to devise manoeuvres to find a solution.


Israel had prolonged the crisis by bringing the flotilla activists to its shores for interrogation. Every minute in Israel played into the Palestinian PR. In the world’s eye, Israel behaves time and again as the neighbourhood bully who is not shy to use its force against suspected enemies. It uses force because it can. A sophisticated brute uses force only when he must. A simple brute uses force when he can. Israel’s present leadership part company from the sophisticated.


Only two weeks earlier, on May 16, Israel refused the entry of Professor Noam Chomsky who was invited to speak at Bir Zeit University. Is he a terrorist and security threat too? What would you gain by refusing his entry? Is it because Chomsky is a vocal opponent of the Israeli occupation? There are many who oppose the occupation inside Israel, people who hold Israeli citizenship. Will they be excluded as well?


Earlier this year, in January 2010, Turkish Ambassador to Israel, Ahmet Oguz Celikkol, was summoned by Deputy Foreign Minister, Danny Ayalon, to receive a reprimand for an anti-Israeli television show aired in Turkey. The Turkish diplomat was made to sit on a low sofa so Ayalon could look down on him, while the Turkish flag was deliberately not put on display. As soon as the meeting was over (maybe even before), the humiliating photo, with the appropriate interpretation for the event, was all over the Israeli newspapers. The neighbourhood brute showed its power to its then friend, a small and insignificant country of only 74 million Muslim people. God, we think we are so damn clever.


The Big Picture:

Leaders need to be capable to map targets and priorities, see the big picture and be willing to make concessions, adjustments, and compromises to reach the desired, most important ends. Iran is surely a priority. If Israel were to attack Iran then it needs to mobilise the world’s understanding. Its airplanes are likely to pass through Turkish territory. It can be assumed that Iranian retaliation would include Jewish targets on foreign land. Why should you alienate yourself from the world community by brute, unconstructive behaviour that yields very little positive outcome for yourself? Israel seems to be on an automatic driver into diplomatic disaster. Our relations with the USA are tenuous. Our relationships with Europe are delicate and vulnerable. Our relationships with Jordan and Turkey are the worst in years. Our relationships with Egypt are somewhat better only because we have a common enemy, radical Islam. And with our two other neighbours, Syria and Lebanon, the relationships are conflictual with the ever-existing possibility of sliding into yet another bloody war. Thank god. Our relationships with Micronesia are still good. At least that...


Lastly, one piece of advice to Mr. Netanyahu. It is not prudent to declare that “There is no humanitarian crisis in Gaza.” Even if this is correct, from where you stand this is not what people expect you to say, not in Gaza, not in Europe, not even in Israel.


On the situation in Gaza, see below.


Insani Yardim Vakfi (IHH)


The Humanitarian Relief Fund ("Insani Yardim Vakfi" in Turkish, or IHH) was established in 1992 and officially registered in Istanbul in 1995. A French intelligence report concluded that in the mid-1990s, IHH president Bulent Yildrim was directly involved in recruiting veteran soldiers in anticipation of the coming holy war [jihad]. “In particular, some men were sent into war zones in Muslim countries in order to acquire combat experience." The French report noted that IHH provided financial support "as well as caches of firearms, knives, and pre-fabricated explosives" in an effort to obtain "political support from these countries." IHH phone records in Istanbul reportedly included repeated telephone calls in 1996 to an al-Qaeda guesthouse in Italy and to North African terrorists active in Europe.



In addition, a 1996 CIA report on terrorist abuse of charities, declassified after the September 11 attacks, documented IHH as a charity with ties to "Iran and Algerian groups." According to the report, the director of the IHH office in Sarajevo "has been linked to Iranian operatives." The report described "the terrorist-related activities and linkages" of fifteen selected "Islamic NGOs". According to French court documents, IHH was the subject of a Turkish criminal investigation in late 1997 when sources revealed that leaders of the group were purchasing automatic weapons from other regional Islamist militant groups. Based on an analysis of seized IHH documents, Turkish authorities concluded that "detained members of IHH were going to fight in Afghanistan, Bosnia, and Chechnya."



IHH is a member of the "Union of Good" (Itelaf al-Khair, also known as the "Charity Coalition"). According to Palestinian intelligence, this organization "is considered one of the biggest Hamas supporters." Israel outlawed the Union of Good in February 2002, and the United States named it a specially designated global terrorist entity in November 2008. According to the U.S. Treasury Department, the Union of Good was created by the Hamas leadership "in order to facilitate the transfer of funds to Hamas." Intelligence underpinning the U.S. designation noted that the group "facilitates the transfer of tens of millions of dollars a year to Hamas-managed associations." It also acts as a broker for Hamas by facilitating financial transfers between a web of charitable organizations and “Hamas-controlled organizations in the West Bank and Gaza”.



The IHH also has a history of fighting the Turkish government, and several of its leaders and members have been arrested for illegal arms procurement and purchasing bombmaking material from Turkish terror groups. That criminal investigation, however, was axed by the Erdogan government. Most damning for the IHH, perhaps, was testimony to a U.S. court in 2003 by the French Judge Jean-Louis Bruguiere that the IHH played a "central role" in the attempted al-Qaeda millennium bomb plot targeting Los Angeles International Airport. Bruguiere added that the IHH was a so-called "cover-up" NGO that had served to recruit activists and forge documents as well as traffic weapons for the terrorists involved in the terror attempt.

Sources: Matthew Levitt, David Makovsky and Jeffrey White, “Fallout from the Gaza Flotilla Tragedy”, Policy Watch, No. 1662, The Washington Institute (June 1, 2010); Magnus Norell, “Fallout from the Gaza Interdiction”, Infosphere AB (May 31, 2010).


The Social-Economic Situation in Gaza


Some 7,000 rockets were fired on Israel from the Gaza Strip for several years, mostly after Israel completely pulled out of Gaza. In December 2008-January 2009 Israel said enough is enough and launched Cast Lead.


According to Medecins Sans Frontieres Report of January 5, 2010, the Gaza health care system's ability to function properly has been weakened considerably after Cast Lead Operation. Most medical equipment is unreliable and the Israeli embargo makes it impossible to obtain certain spare parts. Similarly, medical units also face drug shortages.


More than 5,000 people were wounded during the January 2009 war. Many are disabled and the only rehabilitation centre in the Gaza Strip also finds it difficult to import raw materials and the components required to manufacture artificial limbs. Patients who cannot be treated in the Gaza Strip should be cared for elsewhere, but requests for authorization to travel are so complicated to obtain - on both the Israeli and Palestinian sides - that some cannot leave Gaza in time to arrive for their appointment.


The psychological impact of Operation Cast Lead is difficult to assess. Children are particularly affected (school absenteeism and failure, aggression and bedwetting). Domestic violence has become a major social problem. The World Health Organization estimates that between 20,000 and 50,000 people will have long-term illness following the war.


Livelihoods were systematically destroyed, particularly in January 2009. Many small companies, both factories and shops, and private homes were razed or seriously damaged. The United Nations estimates the total cost of this destruction at $139 million.


140,000 Gazans were unemployed, bringing the unemployment level to 50 percent, compared to 32 percent in 2007. These figures are among the highest in the world. The blockade has caused the loss of 120,000 jobs in the private sector. On average, every worker must support six or seven family members. Seventy percent of families live on less than $1/day. 75-80 percent of the Gaza population - more than 1.1 million people - relies on food aid.


The restrictions related to heightened security, the last military offensive and the increasingly drastic limitations on fishing and farming areas affect food supplies and produce major price fluctuations. In January 2007, more than 600 trucks entered Gaza every day, compared to fewer than 100 in January 2010, 70 percent of which carry food stuffs.


Restrictions on importing construction materials worsen the already-precarious living conditions for the 20,000 displaced persons. One year after the war, most of them were still living in makeshift shelters or the ruins of their house.


During Operation Cast Lead, crucial electricity and water infrastructure and the sanitation system, were targeted and partially destroyed. There is just one power plant left in Gaza. Sixty percent of energy needs are met by buying electricity from Israel and Egypt. Power outages - which last from four to eight hours - occur every day and 10 percent of the population has no electricity at all.


The water system is also extremely fragile and 90 percent of the water provided to Gaza residents fails to meet the World Health Organization (WHO) safe drinking water standards. Every day, approximately 80 million litres of wastewater go untreated and are discharged into the Mediterranean, posing risks to health and the environment - particularly fishery products. Water-related illnesses, such as acute diarrhea, are increasing. No major reconstruction or repair of this public infrastructure has been performed to date.



Source: Gaza: One year after the war, http://www.msf.org/msfinternational/invoke.cfm?objectid=FDFD7D00-15C5-F00A-256DC41B7607854B&component=toolkit.article&method=full_html



Praise for the Association for Civil Rights in Israel



I wish to praise The Association for Civil Rights in Israel (Israel’s ACLU) for its stand on the flotilla incident. On June 1, 2010 ACRI issued a press release admonishing the flotilla takeover and outcome, and calling for investigation:



“The Association for Civil Rights in Israel is appalled by today's military takeover of the Flotilla on its way to Gaza, and calls for an independent investigation of the event. It is unfathomable that a Flotilla whose purpose was to protest the siege imposed by Israel on the Gaza Strip, ended with nine dead and many more injured”.



Hagai El-Ad, Director of ACRI: "The same guiding principles of military force that put one and a half million people under siege in Gaza for four years is what led to this military action which turned into a bloodbath. These circumstances make necessary an immediate investigation by an external body into the events and their deterioration. This is all substantiated by the electronic force-field and limited media coverage imposed on today's events."



The Association for Civil Rights in Israel repeats its call to the government of Israel to end the illegal and immoral siege which gravely damages civil society in Gaza.



Suorce: http://www.acri.org.il/eng/story.aspx?id=729


The Enemy of My Former Friend Is Becoming My Friend



Israel relentlessly pushes Turkey into the hands of Iran. The two are buddying up as if there was no yesterday. Suddenly they discover they have a lot to talk about, mutual interests, and new horizons.



On June 9, 2010 the United States pushed through a new round of United Nations sanctions against Iran. Two of the 15 nations now on the council Security Council decision voted against the measure. Who are the two? Brazil and Turkey.


Iran


Iran is happy to rush to the scene and contribute to the escalation. President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was quick to blast the Israeli raid on the flotilla ships, saying it was a sign that Israel lost its self-control. He promised that “Thousands of freedom flotillas” across the world will sail out to the Gaza Strip.


Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei considers instructing the Revolutionary Guards to provide military escort to the ships en route to the Gaza Strip. Ali Shirazi, Khamenei’s representative in the Revolutionary Guards, said that the Iranian navy is prepared to escort the Gaza peace flotilla with all its forces and capabilities. He said that if the Supreme Leader gives the instruction, the Revolutionary Guards will do everything in their power to secure the ships, and that it was Iran’s duty to protect the innocent people in the Gaza Strip.


Wonderful. We are heading to even more interesting times.


Britain’s Largest Academic Union Cuts Ties with Israel’s Histadrut




Enemies of Israel were quick to act, when the anti-Israel sentiments are still boiling. The largest British academic trade union voted at its annual conference on June 3, 2010 to sever all ties with the Histadrut, Israel’s largest trade union, and to support the Palestinian-led boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) campaign against Israel. The University and College Union (UCU), which has about 120,000 members, are advocating that other trade unions to do the same. Pro-Palestinian activist and Brighton University lecturer Tom Hickey initiated the motion, accusing the Histadrut of having supported “the Israeli assault on civilians in Gaza” in January 2009. The motion condemned the international community for failing to confront Israel and it also called for practical support of Palestinian academic trade unionists.



British trade unions have a lot in common with the Histadrut. I am very sorry for this harsh decision, and I fail to see how such sanctions can possibly serve the best interests of Palestinians. Hickey and his likes wish to make Israel the world pariah. They are driven by vitriolic hate, not by peace or any Judea-Christian values. They are set to destroy, not to build; to uproot, not to build. The true meaning of peace is remote from their intentions, and compassion is foreign to their actions. Israel, not Palestine, is their obsession.



Privacy Conference


For the third year running, I attended the GW-Berkeley Privacy Law Scholars Conference, this time in Washington. I love the format by which all participants read the papers prior arrival, and thus are able to engage in informed debate with the authors of the papers who need not present the papers but instead address questions and comments. Each year, it seems that more and more people are becoming aware of cyber wrongs and cyber harms, not only concerning violation of privacy.




It was wonderful to return to DC, my favourite city. I thank Yardena and Ori Lev, Frances and Tim Sellers, Mike van Dusen, Joe Gildenhorn, Rafi Danziger and Lee Rawls for their kind hospitality. It is always good to see you.


AICE Visiting Israel Professors



The non-profit American-Israeli Cooperative Enterprise (AICE) is now accepting applications from Israeli faculty interested in being considered as Visiting Israel Professors in the United States for the 2011-12 academic year. Thanks to the generous support of the Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family Foundation, AICE will select at least 20 major American universities to receive grants to appoint Schusterman Visiting Israel Professors. We anticipate funding from other foundations to support several additional visiting professors. Each university will receive $50,000 toward the salary and benefits of the Visiting Israel Professor and up to $10,000 to reimburse the scholar’s travel expenses.

This year, AICE is especially looking this year for professors in the humanities, law and business.


Further details at http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/isdf/announce11.html



My Twitter




You can now follow me on Twitter. My account almagor35


Looking forward to hearing from you.



New Books

The Staff of The Washington Post, The Inside Story of America’s New Health-Care Law and What It Means for Us All (NY, 2010).



After a year-long political war, President Obama and the Democratic leaders of Congress achieved in March 2010 a victory that has eluded lawmakers for seventy-five years: an overhaul of America's health care system. But despite the incessant and often rancorous debate that preceded the bill's passage, most Americans still don't understand what is in the final legislative package or what reform will—or won't—mean for them.



In Landmark, reporters and editors from the national staff of the Washington Post provide a comprehensible summary of the legislation the president signed into law, and examine the impacts it will have on Americans in various categories, on health care providers and insurers, and on the health care system as a whole. They also provide a fascinating behind-the-scenes narrative of how the legislation came together, and of the political obstacles, events, negotiations, and compromises that helped determine its shape. Landmark is an invaluable resource for anyone who wants to understand the historic changes now under way.

http://www.landmarkbook.com/

I thank Frances Sellers for a copy of this book.



Menachem Kellner, Torah in the Observatory: Gersonides, Maimonides, Song of Songs (Brighton, MA: Academic Studies Press, 2010).



Rabbi Levi ben Gershom (Ralbag, Gersonides; 1288-1344), one of medieval Judaism's most original thinkers, wrote about such diverse subjects as astronomy, mathematics, Bible commentary, philosophical theology, "technical" philosophy, logic, Halakhah, and even satire. In his view, however, all these subjects were united as part of the Torah. Influenced profoundly by Maimonides, Gersonides nevertheless exercised greater rigor than Maimonides in interpreting the Torah in light of contemporary science, was more conservative in his understanding of the nature of the Torah's commandments, and more optimistic about the possibility of wide-spread philosophical enlightenment.


Gersonides was a witness to several crucial historical events, such as the expulsion of French Jewry of 1306 and the "Babylonian Captivity" of the Papacy. Collaborating with prelates in his studies of astronomy and mathematics, he had an entrée into the Papal court at Avignon. Revered among Jews as the author of a classic commentary on the latter books of the Bible, Kellner portrays Gersonides as a true Renaissance Man, whose view of Torah is vastly wider and more open than that held by many of those who treasure his memory.


Author: Born and educated in the United States, Menachem Kellner (Ph.D., Washington University in St. Louis, 1973) has lived in Israel for the last 30 years. Author, editor, or translator of 16 books and over 100 scholarly articles, Kellner’s most recent books include Science in the Bet Midrash (Academic Studies Press, 2009) and Maimonides’ Confrontation with Mysticism (2006).


"Professor Kellner is one of the more productive and creative scholars in medieval Jewish thought. Over the years he has published many important essays on various aspects of medieval Jewish philosophy, especially on Gersonides and Maimonides. These studies are fundamental readings for any student of medieval Jewish philosophy. This anthology of his writings is a most valuable contribution to our understanding of these two thinkers."

--Seymour Feldman, Professor of Philosophy, Emeritus, Rutgers University



Movie

Flame and Citron (2009)

Flame and Citron is based on true events that took place in Denmark during WWII. The most intriguing period in history for me is 1930-1950. I devoted some twenty years of my life to study it, and to comprehend it. I wanted to understand how a nation can become so evil. How come one of the most civilized nations mobilized all its state powers to destroy and to annihilate a people? Why people, normal people, educated people, gladly participated in monstrous activities? It took me some time to find answers to these questions. Anyway, WWII films are high on my priority list, and Flame and Citron is concerned with Denmark, one of two countries that were under Nazi occupation and refused to participate in the annihilation campaign. The other country was Bulgaria, which explains my existence. My mom is from Bulgaria.


Flame and Citron were members of the Danish resistance. The film raises serious moral questions as they were in the execution business. The received hit lists and without much queries executed the people on the list. Is it ever justified to assume the role of the persecution, the judge and the firing squad? Should we trouble ourselves with such questions when dealing with the most evil regime ever to exist in history? Flame and Citron thought that it is a luxury to be engaged with such questions. There is a job to do. Someone has to do it. They decided to be that someone.


English Football


Another exciting season of football has ended. My team, Tottenham Hotspur, did well although it is still lacking “killer instinct” and belief that it is capable to go all the way to win the championship. The most exciting team was Arsenal, with many talents who are joy to watch. As always, it is most difficult to pick a team, especially the midfield, as the great concentration of talents is in this department. Notice that many of the great players are not English.



Watching Hull City at the KC stadium was frustrating. The team did not gel until the last moments of the season, with obvious deficiencies in defence and attack, its best player Geovanni watching most of the season from the bench.



Here are the players that impressed me the most in a 1-4-3-3 formation.


Goal Keeper:

Shay Given (Manchester City and Ireland)



He was always among the best keepers in the world. This year, for a change, he is playing in a very good team.

Defence:

Patrice Evra (Manchester United, France). Best in his role in England.




Chris Samba (Blackburn Rovers, Congo)



A towering presence wherever he is. Strong, reliable, confident, he deserves a better team. A real threat in the air for any defence.


Thomas Vermaelen (Arsenal and Belgium)

Photo: Arsenal FC



One of the most intelligent defenders in the world. Reliable and have an unusual skills in handling the ball. He is capable of scoring goals from any distance.


Vedran Ćorluka (Tottenham and Croatia)


The best in his role this year in England.



Midfield:

I chose those who play total football, meaning able to play all over the pitch, attack well, and defend well.


Antonio Valencia (Man. Utd., Ecuador). Last year I wrote that he should move to a better team, where he could better fulfill his potential. Manchester Utd purchased him and Valencia proved a great asset.



Steven Gerard (Liverpool, England). Always joy to watch. Provides skills and leadership.





Abou Diaby (Arsenal and France)

Photo: Arsenal FC



Diaby does everything, anywhere. Arsène Wenger allows him freedom to play whenever he feels like, trusting his impeccable understanding of the game. One of the most impressive players in this difficult league.

Strikers:

Wayne Rooney (Manchester United, England). Player of the year.



Jermain Defoe (Tottenham and England)


Photo: Tottenham FC


Sharp, always a threat, with great ability to translate meagre chances into goals. Quick and versatile, an asset for his teams.


Didier Drogba (Chelsea and Ivory Coast)



Strong, powerful, athletic. It takes very strong defenders to contain him as his physical strength alone is enough to overcome defence.



In addition, I should note:

Goal Keepers: Jose Manuel (Pepe) Reina (Liverpool, Spain); Brad Friedel (Aston Villa, USA)

Defenders: Nemanja Vidic (Manchester United, Serbia), Phil Jagielka (Everton, England), Kolo Toure (Manchester City, Ivory Coast), Julian Lescott (Manchester City, England)

Excellent midfield players:

Mikel Arteta (Everton, Spain). Superb player. His understanding of football is flawless. Master of the game.



Frank Lampard (Chelsea, England). So quiet and so effective. Excellent finish.


Dirk Kuyt (Liverpool, the Netherlands). Always works his socks out. Relentless.



Samir Nasri (Arsenal, France). A genius with the ball. Each touch is a joy for the eyes. Few people can master the ball as well as he does.



Andrey Arshavin (Arsenal, Russia). So talented. Brilliant.


Photo: Arsenal FC



James Milner (Aston Villa, England). Hard worker. Gives one hundred percent.




Ces Fabregas (Arsenal, Spain). Another product of Barcelona. Frustrates his opponents time and again.


Photo: Arsenal FC



Strikers: Dimitar Berbatov (Manchester United, Bulgaria), Carlos Tevez (Manchester City, Argentina), Theo Walcott (Arsenal, England)

I also note players who made their impression on the league for one extraordinary skill they possess:



Graham Alexander (Burnley and Scotland), for his perfect ability to score penalties. What an important quality that is to have on a team.


Rory Delap (Stock) for his extraordinary, powerful hand throws.




Their bullet precision has been translated to many goals. Because of Delap, Stock is the only team whose opponents prefer to give away corners instead of side line balls.

Promise:

Darron Gibson (Manchester United and Republic of Ireland)


He has the talent, the zeal, and the tenacity to succeed in the very high level of the game.



Improved Player of the Year:

Gareth Bale (Tottenham Hotspur and Wales)


Bale was signed from Southampton as a 17-year-old in May, 2007. He did not play much until December 2009 and when he played his luck did not show. Bale, for many games, never finished a game with Spurs on the winning side. Slowly things began to change in early 2010. Spurs won with him playing, and in March came the great break. Bale became the best left winger in England, playing either as a defender or as an attacker, sometimes both. His energy is relentless, his ability to master the ball superb, and unlike many defenders he knows how to score. His contract with Spurs was supposed to expire in 2012 but Spurs were quick to sign him recently to a new four-year contract until 2014. If Bale will continue the form he has shown during the past weeks, he will be snapped by one of the great clubs of the continent. There is no player in his age that has Bale’s qualities in England at present. He is a true joy to watch and appreciate. Superb. Simply superb.

Unfulfilled promise:

Eduardo (Arsenal, Croatia): Since his return from his horrible injury, Eduardo is not dominating as he used to be. To be fair, Wenger does not give him many chances to play. His teams, and football fans, need to see him back to his form.


Photo: Arsenal FC

Wishes for the World Cup

Good Luck to England in the South Africa World Cup. It is going to be an exciting month. In the semi-finals, I expect to see Brazil, Germany and Spain. Other contenders are Argentine, Italy and England. All teams, but Spain, won the World Cup before. I am very conservative in my expectations.


It will be very nice if England will win the world cup. It has been a while (1966). England has the right manager for the job, with the right drive and winning mentality. The question is whether Fabio Capello will be able to instill in his players what he has in abundance.

I hope that one, possibly two African teams will reach the quarter finals.

I wish one Asian team will reach the quarter finals.


I wish Vincent Enyeama to sign a contract with Spurs. Spurs needs an excellent goalkeeper and Enyeama would love to play in Europe, as he is well regarded.


I wish Gennaro Gattuso good health, and that he will not harm the good health of his opponents.



Finally, I wish for a peaceful, event-free World Cup. May all the excitement be only on the pitch. This is not a small feat to ask for.



Bye Bye Hull City


For the past two years I enjoyed quality premier league football at the KC Stadium in Hull. I watched the best teams in England, including my beloved Spurs, and some of the most impressive footballers in the world. This treat, I am sorry to say, is now over as Hull had been relegated. This was hardly surprising. A team with weak defence, weak offence, that puts its best player (Giovanni) on the bench, cannot compete in the highest level of the game. Hull needs to rebuild itself in the lower league.



I had an enjoyable time watching the best football in the world also thanks to my companion, George Talbot. I thank George for many enjoyable and memorable hours together.



Monthly Poem



Difficult to be a Bridge

By Raphael Cohen-Almagor


It is difficult to be a bridge

Just passing

Never staying

Never establishing oneself.


Leads from here to there

Means, not an end

Brief stay

And already overlooking from the other side

Move on, continue.


And it remains alone

Lonesome behind

Seeking some affection

Way out of the cumbersome solitude

Cold.


If at least

It was given

A neighbouring friendly bridge

To cry over its shoulder.



Light Side

A joke I heard from Martin Kramer:


A man named Ali walks in the desert. For many miles all he sees only sand. No one on sight. Then after many hours Ali sees a little hut. He increases his pace and full of hope he enters the hut.

“May I have water and whatever you have to eat?”

“No, sorry”, was the answer.

“Nothing? What do you sell here?” asked Ali.

“Ties”.

“Ties? Are you crazy? Why does one need a tie in such heat? Don't you have water?”

“No”.

“Majnun”, said Ali.

“If you want water and food, there is a restaurant one mile up the road”.

“Ok”, said Ali and resumes walking.

“Do you want a tie?”

“May your house destroyed”, said Ali in utter disbelief.

An hour later Ali returns to the hut. “I met your brother”.

“Ahmmmm”.

“He’ll serve me food and water only if I wear a tie”.


Peace and lovely summer.

Yours as ever,


Rafi



My last communications are available on http://almagor.blogspot.com/

earlier posts at my home page: http://hcc.haifa.ac.il/~rca/



People wishing to subscribe to this Monthly Newsletter are welcome to e-mail me at r.cohen-almagor@hull.ac.uk


Raphael Cohen-Almagor

Chair in Politics

The University of Hull

Cottingham Road

Hull, HU6 7RX

United Kingdom

T: +0044 (0)1482 465024

F: +0044 (0)1482 466208

R.Cohen-Almagor@hull.ac.uk

Sunday, June 06, 2010

 Politics – May 2010



Probably, no nation is rich enough to pay for both war and civilization. We must make our choice; we cannot have both.                       

                                Abraham Flexner


Gilad is still in captivity. Veshavu banim legvulam.

                              
                                       Raphael Cohen-Almagor


Obituary: Professor Jack Pole


Iran


Nuclear Proliferation


James Jones on USA-Israel Relationships


British Elections


Michael Ignatieff’s on Israel


Greece


Conference in Toronto


Blog in the News


Stop the Faeroe Islands’ Slaughter of the Calderon Dolphins


Photos of the Month


My Republished Article


My Visit to Washington DC


New Books


In the Swimming Pool


Concert of the Month


Sport Event


Movie Recommendation


Monthly Poem


Light Side


Gilad's Shalit's father made a video clip

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8VH9xQbYJP8&feature=related


This is a heartbreaking video of a father to the world.


This is a call for an act of humanity.


Free Gilad Shalit. The government should invest in his release. It should be one of its top priorities.

Veshavu banim legvulam.


                                                   Ynet


Obituary: Professor Jack Pole


                                                Photo: The Times           


During my doctoral studies at St. Catherine’s College (1988-1991) I was granted dining privileges on the High Table and became a member of the Senior Common Room. I have met many interesting people during those lovely evenings, among them the historian of the United States Jack Pole.


Sitting next to Jack was always fascinating. A true intellectual with vast interests, many of them close to mine, Jack could speak with understanding and knowledge about history, politics, arts, sports (cricket, his passionate love), academic life, Cambridge, Oxford, Princeton and other places he knew. I never met anybody who knew modern American history to the extent that Jack did. Jack and I developed a close friendship. He became a welcomed guest at my home, and I at his. I always enjoyed his wisdom, healthy curiosity, ability to talk and, no less importantly, to listen, his dry humour and cynicism, his sharp eye for current events accompanied and enriched by a deep understanding of history.


Jack showed keen interest in my career and offered to help, although he was not in my field. I appreciated his generosity and good intentions. Upon returning to Israel, I organized for him a lecture tour in my country. He was very happy to come, visited several universities, delivered lectures, and met new people. Jack’s middle name was Richon (first in Hebrew, as Jack emphasized) and we had many conversations about politics in the UK, Israel and the USA. His view of politics and society was guided by a sense of justice, compassion, integrity, balance and responsibility. Jack was an enlightened historian with constructive and healthy real-politic assessment of events.


Well after his retirement in 1989, Jack continued to do research and publish. At the same time, he cultivated his passion for painting and did a few exhibitions. He always loved to paint. Retirement gave him the time to pursue and achieve this dream. He was very proud of this second “career”, making his passion for the arts an integral part of his days.

Jack was always curious to meet new, interesting people. Like me, he was happy to introduce to one another his mutual friends. Through him I met Professor Joyce Appleby at UCLA who was very welcoming to me during my year in LA. When I edited a book in honour of Isaiah Berlin, Jack gladly contributed an excellent chapter “Freedom of Speech: Right or Privilege?” I thought it was one of the best chapters of the collection, Challenges to Democracy: Essays in Honour and Memory of Isaiah Berlin (London: Ashgate Publishing Ltd., 2000).

Up until his death we used to meet whenever I visited Oxford. His last few years were trying, as Jack was fighting Parkinson. During this period, his close companion was Janet Wilson. Despite the disease, Jack continued to work. It was very important for him to continue working although typing became a great challenge. An annotated edition of The Federalist Papers (2005) tracked down and explained the plethora of classical, literary and historical allusions which early American federalists made in their writings. His Contract and Consent: Representation and the Jury in Anglo-American Legal History, published shortly before his death, explored the English roots of American law and politics.


As befitted a man of his eminence, Jack held a long list of academic distinctions. He was a Fellow of the Royal Historical Society and the British Academy; a member of the Academie Européenne d'Histoire and the Institute for Early American History and Culture; and an Honorary Member of the American Historical Association and the Historical Society of Ghana. In 2000, he was also made Honorary Vice-President of the Association of British American Nineteenth-Century Historians.


Farewell Jack. You live in my heart forever.

Professor Jack Pole, a friend, a mensch, historian of the US, Fellow of St. Catherine’s College, was born on March 14, 1922. He died on January 30, 2010, aged 87.


See:
 http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/obituaries/article7031075.ece

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/obituaries/professor-jack-pole-eminent-scholar-best-known-for--his-work-on-the-history-of-colonial-and-revolutionary-america-1918383.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/7407991/Professor-Jack-Pole.html

http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2010/mar/04/jack-pole-obituary

http://janus.lib.cam.ac.uk/db/node.xsp?id=EAD/GBR/0014/POLE


Iran

Remains defiant. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad acknowledged at the end of his two-day visit to the United Nations in early May that new international sanctions could soon be imposed on Iran, but stressed this wouldn't deter his government from pushing forward with its nuclear program. He also said that new U.N. sanctions against Iran would formally close the window on any potential diplomatic rapprochement between Washington and Tehran during President Barack Obama's tenure, and perhaps much longer.


U.S.-Iranian relations have been severed since 1980 following the overthrow of American-backed Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi and the hostage-taking of 50 American diplomats in Tehran.


The U.S. charges Iran with seeking to develop atomic weapons—an accusation Ahmadinejad again denied —and is lobbying permanent Security Council members Russia and China to back stiff penalties against Iran's financial, transportation and energy sectors in the coming weeks. Russian and Chinese officials have indicated in recent days that they would likely agree to some sanctions resolution against Iran, though probably not the severest measures Washington is seeking.


The Iranian president stressed that if diplomacy fails, his government is confident it could endure any new financial pressures the international community imposes. "While we do not welcome sanctions, we do not fear them either," Mr. Ahmadinejad said. "Sanctions cannot stop the Iranian nation."


The Iranian leader said Tehran would strongly support its regional allies if any military conflict involving Israel broke out in the Middle East.


U.S. and Israeli officials have voiced growing concern in recent months that Iran and Syria are significantly increasing their arms shipments to militant groups such as Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in the Palestinian territories. Israeli officials have subsequently warned that they could be forced to take pre-emptive action to guard against long-range missiles entering Lebanon. "We will completely defend them and support them," Ahmadinejad said of Syria, Hamas and Hezbollah. "If it [Israel] starts a new war, it will be the last war."


Source: The Wall Street Journal (May 5, 2010), http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703866704575223642297094652.html?mod=WSJ_World_LEFTSecondNews#printMode


Nuclear Proliferation

Saudi Arabia, wary of Iran’s attempts to become nuclear, has taken a step towards acquiring such capacity itself. Tel Aviv Institute of National Security Studies recently issued a report stating that Saudi Arabia is upgrading its strategic missile reserves and is inaugurating a new command and control facility associated with the kingdom’s missile force. Riyadh’s view that the Iranian threat is serious and immediate was recently expressed by Foreign Minister al-Faisal: “Sanctions are a long-term solution…But we are looking at an Iranian nuclear program within a shorter term because we are closer to the locus of the threat. We are interested in immediate rather than in gradual solutions.” This view may lead Saudi Arabia to accelerate its timetable, and along with or instead of developing independent nuclear infrastructures, it is not inconceivable that it would prefer buying turnkey components, enter into a military treaty with Pakistan, and in certain scenarios, even deploy Pakistani nuclear forces on Saudi soil because of the urgency and its lack of appropriate infrastructures.



The Report asserts that although in light of America’s superior capabilities it seems that Saudi Arabia, at least for now, has no alternative but to rely on the United States, it would be contrary to Saudi practice to put all its eggs in one basket. It is reasonable to think that for its survival, the royal family would seek to keep all options open. If in Riyadh’s view its essential security interests are threatened and a clear and present danger to the kingdom’s stability emerges, it may prefer to engage in a series of steps, even if contradictory, to ensure its security.


Source: http://www.inss.org.il/publications.php?cat=21&incat=&read=3973

In any event, nuclear proliferation negates the best interests of the free world and increases the region’s volatility and instability. Following Saudi Arabia, other countries might follow suit, including Egypt and Turkey (not an exhaustive list).


James Jones on USA-Israel Relationships


National Security Advisor James Jones addressed The Washington Institute's 25th Anniversary Gala on April 21, 2010, delivering a progress report on the Obama administration's national security priorities in the Middle East. This speech is a must for all those who think that the Obama administration is hostile to Israel. Jones stated that, although the U.S. offer of engagement with Iran still stands, Iran's defiant pursuit of nuclear weapons represents "a significant regional and global threat," and that the United States is "determined to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons." General Jones also suggested that ending the Arab-Israeli conflict would weaken Iran's influence over other Middle Eastern actors, and restated President Obama's commitment to the U.S.-Israel alliance, calling it a "national commitment" and declaring that there is "no space" between the two allies on the issue of Israel's security.




I’d like to quote from Gen. Jones’ important speech on the relationships between Israel and the USA:


Since there has been a lot of distortion and misrepresentation of our policy recently, let me take this opportunity to address our relationship with our ally Israel. Like any two nations, we will have of disagreements, but we will always resolve them as allies. And we will never forget that since the first minutes of Israeli independence, the United States has had a special relationship with Israel. And that will not change.


Why? Because this is not a commitment of Democrats or Republicans; it is a national commitment based on shared values, deep and interwoven connections, and mutual interests.


As President Obama declared in Cairo, "America's strong bonds with Israel are well known. This bond is unbreakable." They are the bonds of history -- two nations that earned our independence through the sacrifice of patriots. They are the bonds of two people, bound together by shared values of freedom and individual opportunity. They are the bonds of two democracies, where power resides in the people. They are the bonds of pioneers in science, technology and so many fields where we cooperate every day. They are the bonds of friendship, including the ties of so many families and friends.


This week marked the 62nd anniversary of Israeli independence -- a nation and a people who have survived in the face of overwhelming odds. But even now, six decades since its founding, Israel continues to reside in a hostile neighborhood with adversaries who cling to the false hope that denying Israel's legitimacy will ultimately make it disappear. But those adversaries are wrong.


As the President said in Cairo, for the entire world to hear, the State of Israel "will not go away." As he said at the United Nations, nations "do the Palestinians no favors when they choose vitriolic attacks against Israel over constructive willingness to recognize Israel's legitimacy and its right to exist in peace and security."


So America's commitment to Israel will endure. And everyone must know that there is no space -- no space -- between the United States and Israel when it comes to Israel's security. Our commitment to Israel's security is unshakable. It is as strong as ever. This President and this Administration understands very well the environment -- regionally and internationally -- in which Israel and the United States must operate. We understand very well that for peace and stability in the Middle East, Israel must be secure.


The United States will never waiver in defense of Israel's security. That is why we provide billions of dollars annually in security assistance to Israel, why we have reinvigorated our consultations to ensure Israel's Qualitative Military Edge, and why we undertake joint military exercises, such as the Juniper Cobra ballistic missile defense exercise that involved more than 1,000 United States servicemen and women. We view these efforts as essential elements of our regional security approach, because many of the same forces that threaten Israel also threaten the United States.


I can also say from long experience that our security relationship with Israel is important for America. Our military benefits from Israeli innovations in technology, from shared intelligence, from exercises that help our readiness and joint training that enhances our capabilities and from lessons learned in Israel's own battles against terrorism and asymmetric threats.


Over the years, and like so many Americans -- like so many of you here tonight -- I've spent a great deal of time with my Israeli partners, including my friends in the IDF. These partnerships are deep and abiding. They are personal relationships and friendships based on mutual trust and respect. Every day, across the whole range of our bilateral relationship, we are working together for our shared security and prosperity. And our partnership will only be strengthened in the months and years to come.


In our pursuit of a two-state solution, we recognize that peace must be made by the parties and cannot be imposed from the outside. At the same time, we understand that the status quo is not sustainable. It is not sustainable for Israel's identity as a secure, Jewish, and democratic state, because the demographic clock keeps ticking and will not be reversed. The status quo is not sustainable for Palestinians who have legitimate aspirations for sovereignty and statehood. And the status quo is not sustainable for the region because there is a struggle between those who reject Israel's existence and those who are prepared to coexist with Israel -- and the status quo strengthens the rejectionists and weakens those who would live in peace.


Obviously, we are disappointed that the parties have not begun direct negotiations. The United States stands ready to do whatever is necessary to help the parties bridge their differences and develop the confidence needed to make painful compromises on behalf of peace. As we do so, we will also strongly support the Palestinian Authority's efforts to develop its institutions from the ground up and call on other states, particularly in the region, to do their part to support the Palestinian Authority as well.


We also continue to call on all sides to avoid provocative actions, including Israeli actions in East Jerusalem and Palestinian incitement that fuel suspicion rather than trust.


So it is time to begin those negotiations and to put an end to excuses. It is time for all leaders in the region -- Israeli, Palestinian, and Arab -- to support efforts for peace.


Source: http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/templateC07.php?CID=525


British Elections

April 29, 2010

There were three TV debates between the three candidates. In all three, the least impressive was Gordon Brown. The more you hear him and see his facial impressions as he reacts to others, the less you appreciate his words and conduct. Brown does not radiate leadership.


Most impressive of the three was Conservative David Cameron. He masters all issues, and is well versed with all issues he needed to address. He criticizes when needed, in good measure and taste; he knows to react and answer tough questions. He has a clear agenda which he is able to present clearly and effectively.

                                          Photo: BBC.com

Liberal Democrat Nick Clegg masters the issues well, is as eloquent as Cameron, knows to stand his ground and from the first debate presented himself as equal to Cameron and Brown, not a third wheel in a dual debate. This is why he was able quickly to become a major factor in the elections, and a prime minister contender. Many in the British public discovered him for the first time, and many of them liked what they heard and saw. Compared with Brown, Clegg is a refreshing revelation. His tactics throughout the debate were simple: Speak clearly, in simple language; be concise; hammer the same argument time and again; do not engage in long debates with Cameron and Brown even when they wish to undermine you or to aggravate you. Clegg did not fall into any trap on the way. Kept firm and assured of himself and his agenda, with bold ideas and bringing wind of change.


All three candidates described immigration as a “problem”. In no subtle manner, a connection was made between immigrants, taking jobs of British, and crime. Staggering. The UK is an immigrant country. You would not find such a discussion in Canada. Of all the many problems that the UK has, it seems that the public ranks immigration as second to the economy, and no party leader has something positive to say about the immigrants who contribute so much to British economy and society. Take out the immigrants from the health system, and health would collapse, and this is just one example. A prime example, but certainly not the sole example.


May 7, 2010


Like millions of people around the globe I followed the elections last night. Nothing surprising. Now this is politics behind closed door, politics of numbers, coalition, tempting, negotiating, promising, small talks, long talks. I worked for Shimon Peres and know this world quite well. Time for trickery and deceit.


Cameron will be the next prime minister. Clegg will find the compromise to join him. But I am unsure whether this will be enough to bolster a coalition for long. The result might still be a short-lived government. The Brits do not have much experience with coalition governments.


Maybe the coalition will mitigate Cameron's plans to cut the high education budget. Many people in the academic circles fear of losing their jobs. Some universities might find it difficult to sustain their operation.


May 8, 2010


Conservatives won 306 seats (+97); Labour 258 seats (-91), Liberal Democrats 57 seats (-5), and other parties 28 seats (-1). The winner needs 326 of the 650 seats in the House of Commons.


The Lib-Dems are pushing to change the electoral system. With 23% of the vote they won just 57 seats. This is a mirror-image of the problem Israel has. I keep saying that we all should learn from the German electoral system that benefits from both the proportional and district systems, mitigating the inherent faults of both. With proportional voting, the result is far too many parties and unstable coalitions; with constituencies the result is unfavourable to parties that come second. A mixed system of 60% elected by a national list and 40% elected in constituencies is the answer.


The media are saying that Britain has little experience in stitching together cross-party agreements. I remained unimpressed. Whenever there is will there is power. Both parties have vested interest to comprise a coalition and this will be the result.


May 10, 2010


Prime Minister Brown announced his intentions to resign as Labour Party leader by September; that is, if he is not eaten prior. Brown is still hopeful to strike a deal with Clegg. From everything that Clegg has projected up until now, Clegg will not do this. He emphasized time and again that politicians should honour public wishes.


May 11, 2010


Less than 24 hours have passed, and Brown is willing to pay with his head to pave the way for Lab-Lib coalition. That’s honourbale and admirable. Never seen this happening in Israeli politics, where politicians are glued to their chairs.


May 12, 2010


Brown feels that Clegg maneuvers him only to get more from Cameron. He demands a committed answer, which Clegg does not wish to give. At 19:18, Brown announces he is resigning as PM with immediate effect. At 20:07 Cameron arrives with his wife at Buckingham Palace, and at 20:34 he leaves the Palace as Prime Minister.



In less than six days, a new coalition was installed. Again, something that we Israelis certainly appreciate as things are very different in the Middle East. In Israel, negotiations last for weeks, and sometimes they fail after intense negotiations, not allowing the designated coalition leader to form a coalition.


At the age of 44 (born October 9, 1966), David Cameron is the youngest prime minister in England in 198 years.


The new deputy prime minister, Nick Clegg is of Cameron’s age, 43. He has only been an MP for five years. Previously Clegg was a European Commission official and a Euro MP. With him, four other Lib-Dem entered government: David Laws as Chief Treasury Secretary; the popular Vince Cable as Business Secretary; Chris Huhne as Energy and Climate Change Secretary, and Danny Alexander as Scottish Secretary. There are four women in the Cabinet’s 23 posts, including Theresa May, the Home Secretary. The new Education Secretary is Michael Gove. A journalist by profession, Gove has used his position as a writer for The Times and a broadcaster on the BBC to fight for greater personal freedom, a tougher line on crime, a more dynamic economy, a cleaner environment, stronger defence and a better deal for hard-pressed families. His most recent book, Celsius 7/7, was released in 2006.


Cameron announced that his government is guided by three key principles: Freedom, fairness and responsibility. The first thing he did is to cut his salary by 5%. This is yet another lesson for the Israeli parliamentarians who only raise their salaries from time to time. They set a very different example to their people.



Michael Ignatieff on Israel


In 1999, I took part in a 21st Century Trust workshop on Media, Power and Responsibility: The role of the fourth estate in the 21st century, with Michael Ignatieff as the Senior Scholar. I heard about Ignatieff in the past, mostly from Isaiah Berlin who granted Ignatieff access to himself and to his scholarship in order for him to write Isaiah’s biography (see http://books.google.com/books?id=tkOdAHGyivMC&dq=Michael%20Ignatieff%20isaiah%20berlin&source=bl&ots=zyv1UqixPG&sig=mxHbxsHs0ASX6nGuWb_q_nIQwM8&hl=en&ei=EIzeS47HH4ze9ASEt4WiBw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CA0Q6AEwAQ). Isaiah was appreciative and so was I upon spending some time with Ignatieff. At that time, I had little idea that one day Michael would become the leader of Canada’s Liberal Party and a serious contender to become Canada’s prime minister.



On April 24, 2010, Ignatieff granted an interview to The Winnipeg Jewish Review and below are his responses to questions relating to Israel.


SPIVAK: In January 2010, Canada announced it would be focusing its efforts on funding the Palestinian justice system, including building courthouses in Ramallah and elsewhere in the West Bank? What do you think of that direction in Canadian policy?


IGNATIEFF: When I was last in Jerusalem I talked to some Canadian officials who were involved in Palestinian policing and heaven knows the Palestinian justice system needs all the help it can get and its police and security systems need all the help they can get so these are long standing commitments of Canada and we would again support them provided that there are no ties to militant extremism, provided these are building capacity for legitimate Palestinian institutions.


SPIVAK: What do you think of the stated intention of the President of the Palestinian Authority Salam Fayyad to declare a Palestinian state unilaterally by the summer of 2011?


IGNATIEFF: The conditions for recognition for a Palestinian state are very complicated... I’m not going to be drawn into anticipating what Salam Fayyad may or may not do, or what the Palestinians may or may not do.


I’ve always been clear that I believe in a two state solution. I don’t believe Israel can be secure unless its got a viable Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza, that can operate as a state, that has a monopoly of the means of force, that lives in peace with Israel and engages in economic partnership with Israel.


So, that’s where I think this has to end and I think that’s where this has to go, but there has to be an orderly process by which Palestinian statehood is achieved and that involves good faith negotiations with the State of Israel next door.


ON ISRAEL APARTHEID WEEK


Ignatieff made the following statement which appeared in the National Post in regard to Israel Apartheid Week:


“On university campuses across the country this week, Israeli Apartheid Week will once again attempt to demonize and undermine the legitimacy of the Jewish state. It is part of a global campaign of calls for divestment, boycotts and proclamations, and it should be condemned unequivocally and absolutely.



Apartheid is defined, in international law, as a crime against humanity. Israeli Apartheid Week is a deliberate attempt to portray the Jewish state as criminal.


The activities planned for the week will single out Jewish and Israeli students. They will be made to feel ostracized and even physically threatened in the very place where freedom should be paramount -- on a university campus.


Let us be clear: criticism of Israeli government policy is legitimate. Wholesale condemnation of the State of Israel and the Jewish people is not legitimate. Not now, not ever.


The very premise of Israeli Apartheid Week runs counter to our shared values of mutual respect and tolerance, regardless of nationality, race or creed. It is an attempt to heighten the tensions in our communities around the tragic conflict in the Middle East.



On behalf of the Liberal party of Canada and the Parliamentary caucus, I urge all Canadians to join with us in condemning Israeli Apartheid Week, and to reject, in principle, all forms of anti-Semitism, racism and intolerance, both within this country and around the world.”


Source: http://israelbehindthenews.com/bin/content.cgi?ID=3972&q=1


Greece


I am worried about the events in Greece. The country is increasingly unstable, and I am worried for my friends there and also for the ramifications that such instability might have on Europe, first on the economy, then politics at large. Greece needs election reform as it is unable to yield a stable government for many years. The public is frustrated, estranged and increasingly violent. The EU should collect itself and start to work. The EU needs to involve itself more, as soon as possible.


Conference in Toronto


I just returned from a most interesting conference in Toronto. Many speakers were united in the view that Israel, like all states, is bound by international law and human rights. It is one of community of nations and should not ignore international law and norms. Many agree that “just peace” to be differentiated from just any peace is a strategic end for Israel. It is a political and moral end. Israel should posit itself in the middle not in extreme margins.


The most thoughtful Keynote Lecture was delivered by Michael Walzer, one of the leading intellectuals of this generation. His lecture, as always, blended knowledge, historical insights and sharp analysis. Walzer provided food for thought, appropriate for the illustrious banquet the followed.


Ruth Gavison argued that Israel should respond to the Goldstone report by addressing the war crime allegations and establish a standing body investigating the behaviour of



the IDF. She asserted that there should not be double standards regarding Israel. Here the crucial issue is asymmetric war. What do you do when the enemy hides among civilians? How should a commander on the ground react when he and his soldiers are attacked from a school and he wants to secure his soldiers lives and stop the fire? There should be common international standards and the Goldstone Committee missed a golden opportunity to address this complicated issue.


I was puzzled to listen to a philosophical lecture about the occupation that started with the proviso that the lecturer is not addressing the morality of occupation. I was intrigued what kind of justification can be given to do this and the answer was even more troubling. If you think that occupation is wrong that's fine and if you think its fine this is also fine. Well no, it is not. Occupation is abominable. Destructive. Inhuman.



Heard a fascinating talk about Iran. The speaker, Dr Brent Talbot, a former army officer who now teaches in the US Air Force Academy, voiced an opinion that Israel is capable of striking Iran, and that it will if the sanctions won’t work. In his view, the world has 12-18 months to stop the Iranian nuclear plan. Israel is capable to attack the main targets in Natanz, Qum, Isfahan and Arak. In his view, the USA under the Obama administration is unlikely to launch such an attack.



I thank Dr. Ralph Halbert and the Israel Studies Association for their kind invitation. I also thank Ravit and Danny David, Peter Cory, Ralph Halbert, Steve Newman and Wayne Sumner for their kind hospitality.


Blog in the News


While in Toronto I granted an interview to a local TV station. I was asked to speak on three issues: The topic of my conference paper, the failed ME peace process; my present research, In Internet’s Way: Social Responsibility on the Free Highway, and my human rights activities, including the campaigns conducted over this Blog during the past ten years. The more exposure of the Blog the merrier.



Stop the Faeroe Islands’ Slaughter of the Calderon Dolphins


I was appalled and disgusted to receive information about the slaughter of the Calderon dolphins in Europe. Every year, in Denmark, specifically the Faroe Islands, these dolphins are slaughtered brutally as part of a pointless and stupid right-of-passage to manhood. You are a man. You can kill. Whauuuu. The poor dolphins are stabbed a number of times, and watched as they bleed to death, probably in excruciating pain while the whole town watches.





















Photos of the Month


Iceland's Eyjafjallajokull Volcano

This volcano is harassing the lives of millions of travellers including yours truly who slept on the airplane for the first time in his life after being stranded in the airport for many long, anxious hours. How is it to live near an erupting giant?

http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2010/04/more_from_eyjafjallajokull.html


I thank Bill Dackman for the link.


My Republished Article

In 2008, I published an article on end-of-life issues in Health Law & Policy, Vol. 2, Issue 1. This article was selected to be included in a collection of essays on end-of-life that was just published in India. See “The Right to Die with Dignity: An Argument in Ethics and Law”, in Rajitha Tadikonda (ed.), Physician Assisted Euthanasia (Hyderabad, India: Amicus Books, 2008-2009), pp. 213-228.


Abstract


I begin by clarifying the meaning of dignity, of respect and concern, and of life. Next I discuss two conflicting notions: sanctity of life, and quality of life. Then I examine the legal situation regarding end-of-life in some democracies: Australia, England, the United States, Canada, Switzerland, the Netherlands and Belgium. I highlight some concerns regarding end-of-life treatment in the two countries that legalized euthanasia: The Netherlands and Belgium. The most worrying data in all the Dutch euthanasia reports from 1990 until the present is that 0.4 percent of deaths were the result of the use of lethal drugs not at the explicit request of the patient. Finally, I devise guidelines for practicing physician-assisted suicide (PAS) based on the experience of the surveyed countries. I argue that individuals should have the power to decide end-of-life issues. Recognizing the concrete fear of abuse, that some people might be put to death without expressing a clear wish to die, I oppose euthanasia. I prefer that the control over life and death matters remain with the patient.


As ever, I’d be happy to circulate my new article to interested parties.


While the title is a bit odd (euthanasia, by definition, is physician-assisted), this collection includes some good pieces, inter alia Arthur Birmingham LaFrance, “Physician Assisted Death: From Rhetoric to Reality in Oregon”; George P. Smith, II, “Intractable Pain, Palliative Management and the Principle of Medical Futility”, and Madelyn Hsiao-Rei Hicks, “Physician-Assisted Suicide: A Review of the Literature Concerning Practical and Clinical Implications for UK Doctors”.


My Visit to Washington DC



                                          Photo: http://www.dcphototour.com/


Early next month I plan to return to the glorious and beloved Washington. I’d be happy to see friends.


New Books


Charles R. Beitz, The Idea of Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009)




The international doctrine of human rights is one of the most ambitious parts of the settlement of World War II. Since then, the language of human rights has become the common language of social criticism in global political life. This book is a theoretical examination of the central idea of that language, the idea of a human right. In contrast to more conventional philosophical studies, the author takes a practical approach, looking at the history and political practice of human rights for guidance in understanding the central idea. The author presents a model of human rights as matters of international concern whose violation by governments can justify international protective and restorative action ranging from intervention to assistance. He proposes a schema for justifying human rights and applies it to several controversial cases--rights against poverty, rights to democracy, and the human rights of women. Throughout, the book attends to some main reasons why people are sceptical about human rights, including the fear that human rights will be used by strong powers to advance their national interests. The book concludes by observing that contemporary human rights practice is vulnerable to several pathologies and argues the need for international collaboration to avoid them.


http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/Politics/InternationalStudies/HumanRights/?view=usa&ci=9780199572458


In the Swimming Pool


As you are preparing yourselves for the summer, airing (or better, buying) your swimsuit and get in shape, here is something about and for the pool.


Most pools consist of two parts: One for players, another for swimmers. The players’ part is for children and children at heart. These are relaxed humans who see the pool as source of fun. The swimmers’ part is for humans who perceive the pool as mixed blessing of varying degrees, fun and work.




In the swimmers’ part, there are different characters:


First, the no-nonsense group. This is the most boring group in the pool. It consists of people who come to swim, period. They have an assignment to fulfil, and they do not relax until reaching the end they set for themselves. They do not talk. They do not mingle. They swim.


This group is quiet and usually courteous.


In this group we can discern different types of swimmers:


The boxers – They take deep breath, head into the water and then with clinched feasts punch the water as hard as they can until they remain breathless. Then they raise their heads above water, another deep breath, head under water (someone told them that this is the correct way to swim), and another punching round. They move slowly, and finish this exercise utterly exhausted.


The defeated cockroaches – They lie on their back, belly they adorned for a good part of their lives above water, sometimes sun glasses completes the show, they start progressing backwards with small movement of hands and sometimes legs, completing one or two rounds in one hour.


The wide breast stylists – They advance with very wide breast strokes that do not dread human flesh. Quite the opposite. Encounters are welcomed. Usually this group consists of men, usually older men, whose wide style reaches beyond one assigned lane. Sometimes such encounters yield shouts and screams, usually between elderly men and elderly women, or in other words, between wide breast swimmers and swimmers with wide breasts.


Then we have the don’t-give-a-damn swimmers, also divided into sub-groups:


Statues – Usually of elderly women who dress up for the occasion with their best outfit which was THE hottest fashion in nineteen hundred and seventy five. Their doctor told them to exercise, and that “swimming is very good for you,” and as conscientious patients they follow doctor’s advice. In the pool they meet like-minded women and began exchange vital information for their well-being, discussing their personal affairs (health), family affairs, neighbourhood affairs, community affairs, national affairs, and international affairs. Covering all these highly interesting and sometimes controversial issues takes a good hour, at least, the time they pledged their doctors to spend in the pool. As long as they stay put, they are like unmovable sectors on your hard disk. Swimmers know they are there and circumvent the statue. They become trickier when they talk and walk. Then unpleasant encounters can develop between the movable and the assumed unmovable objects.


Misguided torpedoes – This group consists of swimmers who insist on swimming on their back. They usually cannot keep a straight line, and of course have no idea what lies in front of them. They are not easily deterred unless they hit a very sturdy man. Only such painful encounter, bone to bone, bone to muscle, may cause them to change their mind and swim like considerate humans.



The Phelps – This group consists of swimmers who are determined to break Phelps’ world record. Nothing would stand on their way, especially not other swimmers. They are racing against unforgiving clock. Of course, they never break Phelps’ record but they never stop trying. This is the most dangerous group in the pool. You better clear the way, or else...


The astronauts, or the free-spirited – All swim clockwise but then there will always be one who swims in the opposite direction, absolutely oblivious to the burning red clockwise signs. As they are astronauts also outside the pool, they associate the nasty encounters with other swimmers to the natural hazards of life. As free-spirited astronauts, only the voice of reason of a resolute life-guard may resolve the anarchical blunder and restore peace and order.


Concert of the Month

Tommy Emmanuel




This was a real treat. I have never seen a guitar player who is capable to extract so many tunes and sounds. Amazing. See http://www.tommyemmanuel.com/



Sport Event


My Italian beloved team Inter Milan is the Champion of Europe after beating Bayern Munich 2:0 at the magnificent Santiago Bernebeu. The night belonged to two people: Diego Milito, the Argentinian striker who scored both goals, and the Portuguese manager José Mourinho who now posits himself as the most suitable man to lead Real Madrid next season.



Bayern held the ball 66% of the game, but was not effective. Inter midfield and defence crushed most attempts without difficulty, and when needed the excellent goal keeper, Julio Cesar, was spot on, able to stop the ball from going into his net. Brilliant in defence, and lethal in the attack, Inter produced more chances than Bayern and deservedly won the most attractive title in Europe. After beating the 2009 Champion Barcelona in the semi-final, Inter was the prime candidate for the title.




Photo: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/european/championsleague/7753720/Inter-Milan-2-Bayern-Munich-0-match-report.html


Man of the Match was Milito. Second best was Argentine midfielder Esteban Cambiasso. Beats me how Diego Maradona -- who leads his country into the World Cup -- left Cambaisso out of the squad. Maradona should reconsider.




Inter won this year all three titles: Italian Champion, Italian Cup, and now the most important prize in Europe. A perfect season.


Movie Recommendation

Dear Frankie (2004)


Frankie is a nine year-old boy. He is sensitive and gentle. His favourite animal is sea-horse, one of the most gentle and harmless animals on earth. Much like Frankie, it is quiet and sweet. Much like Frankie, it needs protection.


Frankie’s mom failed to protect him once, with horrendous consequences. Frankie’s dad inflicted irreparable damage on him, and since that blow Frankie is deaf. Since then, Frankie’s mom is very protective, and she is on the run from Frankie’s dad. Mom also corresponds with Frankie, assuming dad’s identity as a sailor who sails the sea. She benefits from this as well. It is the only opportunity she has to hear Frankie.


But one day, the ship “dad” describes in his letters, on which he works, anchors at Frankie’s town. Mom needs to find someone who will play the dad for Frankie. Mom’s good friend Marie comes to rescue and produces a stranger to play Frankie’s dad.




This is a perceptive drama, directed by Shona Auerbach with utmost sensitivity to details, with superb acting of four: Jack McElhone as beautiful Frankie; Emily Mortimer as the protective mom; Gerald Butler as the stranger who assumed the “dad” role, and Sharon Small as Marie. All key figures are positively good people who try to do good and make most of life and the situations life presented before them.


This heart-warming film is a pearl.


Monthly Poem


She Walks in Beauty


She walks in beauty like the night


of cloudless climes and starry skies;


And all that's best of dark and bright


meets in her aspect and her eyes:


Thus mellow'd to that tender light


which heaven to gaudy day denies.


One shade the more, one ray the less,


had half impair'd the nameless grace


which waves in every raven tress,


or softly lightens o'er her face –


where thoughts serenely sweet express


how pure, how dear their dwelling - place.











And on that cheek, and o'er that brow,


so soft, so calm, yet eloquent,


the smiles that win, the tints that glow,


but tells in days of goodness spent,


a mind at peace with all below,


a heart whose love is innocent.



George Gordon Byron


Light Side


A man suffered a serious heart attack and had an open heart bypass surgery.


He awakened from the surgery to find himself in the care of nuns at a Catholic Hospital. As he was recovering, a nun asked him questions regarding how he was going to pay for his treatment. She asked if he had health insurance. He replied, in a raspy voice, "No health insurance."




The nun asked if he had money in the bank. He replied, "No money in the bank."



The nun asked, "Do you have a relative who could help you?" He said, "I only have a spinster sister, who is a nun."



The nun became agitated and announced loudly, "Nuns are not spinsters! Nuns are married to God."



The patient replied, "Send the bill to my brother-in-law."


Peace and love.


Yours as ever,

Rafi


My last communications are available on http://almagor.blogspot.com/

Earlier posts at my home page: http://hcc.haifa.ac.il/~rca/


People wishing to subscribe to this Monthly Newsletter are welcome to e-mail me at r.cohen-almagor@hull.ac.uk

Raphael Cohen-Almagor

Chair in Politics

The University of Hull

Cottingham Road

Hull, HU6 7RX

United Kingdom

T: +0044 (0)1482 465024

F: +0044 (0)1482 466208

R.Cohen-Almagor@hull.ac.uk