Monday, March 07, 2011

Politics – February 2011 In Memory of Sarah Cohen (January 30, 1930 – February 13, 2011)




The chain reaction of evil —  wars producing more wars — must be broken, or we shall be plunged into the dark abyss of annihilation.

    ~Martin Luther King, Jr.


Gilad is still in captivity. Veshavu banim legvulam.

    ~Raphael Cohen-Almagor




Israel is cognizant that a new regime in Egypt might revoke the relationships we have with our great and intimidating neighbour. We watch as the events unfold with great caution. The greatest fear is that Egypt would fall to the hands of the Muslim Brotherhood. This would bring anti-Semitism of the worst kind very close to our borders. Below information about the Muslim Brotherhood.

Mohamed ElBaradei seeks to replace Mubarak. He maintains good relationships with the Muslim Brotherhood.

The other hot topic in Israel this month was Yoav Galant. When Prime Minister Netanyahu and Defence Minister Barak realized that Galant will now withdraw his candidacy, they did it for him. But Galant refused to give up. Using his media contacts, he continued to occupy the headlines: The prime minister should not decide it alone; the special committee on the nomination of senior officials, the Turkel Committee (same former justice of the Supreme Court who headed the Gaza flotilla committee) should decide the issue. There was some hope for him as Justice Turkel, who some months ago approved Galant’s candidacy for the chief of staff despite the land expropriation allegations, said that “a terrible thing was done to a distinguished officer” and blamed the media for it. When his plea was ignored and the government nominated Benny Gantz he appealed to the Supreme Court but then withdrew the appeal.


Mum
Reflections on January Blog
Muslim Brotherhood
Iran
Yemen
Galant
Benny Gantz
Post Chief of Staff Saga
Katsav, or apples may fall far away from trees
Jonathan Pollard
UK-Israel.com - New website and 2011 Directory
The Herzliya Conference
My New Article
New Books
Movie of the Year
Monthly Poems
Musical Moment
Light Side



Free Gilad Shalit. The government should invest in his release. It should be on its top priorities. Veshavu banim legvulam.



Gilad Shalit


Mum
Sarah Cohen (January 30, 1930 – February 13, 2011)




Mum was born in Yambul Bulgaria to a middle class family. She was the youngest of four children: Jacques, Sofka, Clara and herself. Her father, Yoseph, was a Turkish immigrant who arrived in Yambul, worked in odd jobs, met Rosa (Shoshana) and established a family. Later he opened a coffee shop for working people. He worked very long hours, from 5 am till late evening. Shoshana helped him and took care of the children.

Things changed for worse when the Nazis came. Jacques was sent to a labour camp. Jews had to endure many restrictions and growing anti-Semitism. At school, mum was discriminated against and had unpleasant encounters with teachers and peers. The deputy headmaster was a devout Nazi who did not hide her racist views and her dislike for Jews.

In 1946, mum and Clara made aliya and arrived at Palestine. There she was separated from her sister and was sent to kibbutz Ayelet Hashachar. New beginnings tend to be difficult and this one was no exception. Mum spoke only fluent Bulgarian and found it difficult to communicate with the locals. She was assigned to the laundry room, a place that demanded hard, physical work in the company of older women who did not speak her language. She wanted to escape.

After a few months, mum moved to kibbutz Shfaim near Tel Aviv. There she studied Hebrew and worked in all the kibbutz jobs. Clara moved to Tel Aviv and they were able to meet from time to time.

After two years in Shfaim, mum was recruited to the newly established Israeli army. Mum loved the army service. She assumed important responsibilities, made friends and began to date men. Mum always spoke fondly of her IDF days, saying it was the best time of her life.
After two years, mum completed her service and moved to Tel Aviv, where she lived with Clara and her husband Moshe in a small apartment in Raanan Street in south Tel Aviv. During the days mum worked as a cleaner and washed dishes at modest restaurants; during the nights she went to evening schools to study accountancy. Mum spoke with great sadness about that difficult period. The difficulty was not only physical. Mum endured sexual harassment from restaurant owners who fancied her. She never elaborated on what exactly happened behind the kitchen doors. At some point, mum shifted jobs to clean apartment building stairs.

After completing her studies, mum started working as an accountant at the Water Agency (Mifal Hamaim) and after a while shifted to LaMerchav Newspaper, where she worked until it closed down in 1971. Then she began working at Al Hamishmar Newspaper until that paper closed down in 1995. The family joke was that mum specializes in working for unsustainable business.

In 1956, mum married my father, Yizhar Cohen. In 1959, Yossi was born and two years later I came to the world. Mum and dad lived first in Arlozoroff Street, not far from Dizengoff Street, and in 1959 they moved to Beeri Street, a home they cherished, loved and refused to leave. Both lived in that house until their last days.

Mum loved Israel with all her heart. She always said that there is no other place for Jewish people. She was a true Zionist, very patriotic and steadfast. In Bulgaria, she joined Hashomer Hatzair and until her last days she remained committed to socialist values, believing in the love of people, compassion, in hard work, in equality and in peace. She was very interested in Israeli politics and believed education is the key to success. These are the values she promoted at home, upon which I was raised.

Mum loved theatre. We used to attend shows together, exchanged views about new productions, directors, actors. Until her last days she was always eager to discuss theatre in Israel and abroad. She also enjoyed playing cards, especially Bridge, and used to frequent a Bridge club near Yitzhak Rabin Square in Tel Aviv. Mum enjoyed travelling. Whenever I went, she came for a visit: Oxford, New York, Los Angeles, Beverley and Hull.

Mum stood by me all her life. She was the driving force behind me. She was my anchor, my inspiration, my compass, my guarding angel. I am what I am thanks to her, thanks to her unwavering support, thanks to her big heart and constant love and care.

I love you mum, and miss you so much. I love you until my last day on this planet.


Reflections on January Blog

Professor James Weinstein, from Arizona, wrote:


“Though I am not sure, I think the Holmes poem you provide is by Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. not by his son, the Justice whose picture you place beneath it.” I stand corrected. I think James is right.


Professor Robert O’Neill noted from Australia:

Dear Rafi

Thanks for your latest Politics - very interesting to read, and to have the address line for the Yad Vashem collection. I have looked at it already.

I hope these current developments in Egypt and Yemen lead to peaceful transitions and willingness to engage with the region, but it probably won't be that simple. Testing times we live in!


Professor Joyce Appelby, UCLA, commented:

Very interesting, Rafi, and now everything is up in the air again. I feel for everyone at this critical juncture in the history of Middle Eastern states, except those leaders who have brought their people to this point.  Joyce


Prof. Jo Carby-Hall, University of Hull, wrote:

Dear Rafi,

Many thanks for your  January 2011 Newsletter which I enjoyed reading and from which I learnt a great deal. It is varied, amusing, serious and informative. Combining all these features in one text is no easy matter.

As a non-political scientist I found all you say regarding Israeli politics most informative. I also enjoyed reading the critical appreciation made by one of your readers, namely Yoav, who does not always agree with you. I do not feel qualified to comment  and thus contribute to the debate on the political opinions expressed, as my knowledge of political issues - whether they be Israeli or otherwise, - is very limited.

Of course every lawyer has heard of Oliver Wendell Holmes but I did not know that this famous judge also had poetic talents. I enjoyed reading the poem you quote in your Newsletter. As a law student at Aberdeen University I recall my lecturer in Jurisprudence, Professor Peter Stein,  talking of OWH's theory that there is no certainty in the law and illustrating this with the various cab companies in the different States of the US whose laws differ. In one of his publications, OWH once said that any lawyer who seeks for certainty in the law is not an adult jurist, rather he is like a child who clings to his mother's apron strings to attain security.

I was interested to read of General Galant's property and to see the "castle" he built. I have never seen anything like it during my various trips to Israel. Most buildings are very much more modest. Obviously he enjoys the good life!

I am interested to read that Yad Vashem is obtainable on line. When time allows, I shall look at the website.

The Iranian/Syrian threat is explained in a balanced and realistic manner. There is, of course, world concern about Iran and the dangers posed.

Although I did not know Arthur, I should be pleased in joining you if you to convey to his wife and family by deepest sympathy for their loss. From what you say, he was a scholar and a great man in many other respects

As for the  humeours inscription on the loo, well  "it is a bit of alright" as they say in Yorkshire!

Thank you for pumping some light and humour  in my, otherwise busy day

Yours aye

Jo


Muslim Brotherhood



Text Box: Muslim Brotherhood emblem: Qur'an and Swords The Muslim Brotherhood (Arabic: Hizb al Ikhwan al Muslimeen - The party of the Muslim Brothers or Jamaat al-Ikhwan al-Muslimun - Society of the Muslim brotherhood )  is a fundamentalist international organization or organizations originating in Egypt, whose goals are the conversion of Muslim countries into states ruled by Sha'aria law, the re-establishment of the Caliphate and ultimately, world dominion. The Muslim Brotherhood's ideology, which insists that Islam is a prescription for governance as well as religion, is the prototypical example of Islamism. Their slogan is self-explanatory: "God is our purpose, the Prophet our leader, the Qur'an our constitution, Jihad our way and dying for God's cause our supreme objective."

Different factions of the Muslim Brotherhood believe that an Islamic society can be achieved by violent means in the near term, or by education and "preparation" of society and "democratic" takeover.  The Muslim Brotherhood was founded formally in March 1928 in Egypt by Hassan al-Banna,  but it may have existed before in a less formal framework.

Muslim Brotherhood Ideology

Al-Banna developed the ideology and the methods of organization and recruitment that were to characterize most radical Islamist groups which may or may not have been inspired by the Brotherhood. The ideology includes the following points:

Islam must dominate and not be dominated.

Restoration of the lost caliphate - i'adat al Khalifa al Mafqudah -  is the chief immediate political goal of the Islamist movement.

Islam is currently inferior to the West because it deserted its roots. It will triumph by returning to its pristine form.

Social revolution and anti-colonial struggle are an integral and major part of the mission of the Islamic revival.

Violent Jihad is a central tenet of Islam and martyrdom in the cause of Allah is highly valued.  Violent Jihad is the greater Jihad, while inner struggle for moral purity is the lesser Jihad.

Islam must aim to take over the entire world and assert its superiority through violent Jihad,

Western civilization is doomed by its decadence and Jewish influence.

Ideas such as democracy and human rights are products of Jewish influence and Western decadence. Society must be ruled by God and not men.

The Jews are particularly vile enemies of Islam. Israel is to be opposed because it is a foreign western implant.

Muslim Brotherhood ideology is virulently anti-Semitic, anti-Western and anti-democratic in principle.  It is important to emphasize this last point, in view of the optimistic theories of certain academics who insist that the Muslim Brotherhood and similar groups would evolve toward democracy because of democratic traditions in Islam. The original Muslim Brotherhood ideology views all such democratic traditions as heresy, though it might use democratic means to gain power. Al-Banna was succeeded by Sayyid Qutb. The reasoning behind this opposition is explained in Chapter 6 of Sayyid Qutb's book, Milestones: just government is government by God, and not by men. Qutb believed that the best sort of government was a dictatorship based on Sha'aria Muslim law.

Muslim Brotherhood under Sayyid Qutb


Following his return from the United States in 1951, Sayyid Qutb gradually assumed ideological leadership of the Muslim Brotherhood. Qutb developed and refined al-Banna's ideology. While the idea that Muslim rule had to be extended to the west may have been implicit in Banna's beliefs, Qutb made it far more explicit. He was also more strident in his calls to abrogate all Muslim jurisprudence and return to a somewhat hypothetical pristine state of Islam that existed in the very first years. Qutb's struggle was no longer against colonial oppression, but against the rule of man. He decreed that all governments that did not follow his ideology were in a state of Jahiliya, the darkness and ignorance that according to Islam, pervaded the Arabian peninsula before the advent of Islam. He systematized opposition to current Muslim regimes by proclaiming that all rule of man is oppression. Man can only be free, according to Qutb, by returning to a society where laws are extracted directly from the word of God as explained in the Quran.

Qutb also originated or expanded upon the idea and practice of Takfir, branding other Muslims, and particularly state regimes, as infidels, and thus legitimizing Jihad against the Muslim states. The popularity of this idea may have been encouraged by the suffering of the group at the hands of the Nasserist regime.

In August of 1965, Nasser charged that the Brotherhood had set up an armed organisation to seize power by force and another wave of arrests followed. Hundreds of members were rounded up.

In 1966 three Brotherhood leaders - Sayed Qotb, Youssef Hawwash and Abdel-Fattah Ismail - were sentenced to death and executed for plotting against Nasser. More than 100 others were condemned to various prison terms.

Muslim Brotherhood Since Qutb

Following Nasser's death in 1970 and Anwar As-Sadat's rise to power, jailed Brotherhood members were released. Groups began to splinter off from the Muslim Brotherhood. The Al-Takfir Wal Hijra - a group that views society as infidel and advocates withdrawal from it announced its appearance by kidnapping and killing a cabinet minister and launching an attack on the Technical Military Academy.

The mainstream Muslim Brotherhood reached a modus vivendi by renouncing violence. It remained illegal, it was tolerated by the government and, in some cases, even encouraged as a counter-balance to leftist forces whom Sadat considered the main threat to his regime.

In 1976, the group was allowed to publish a monthly magazine, Al-Dawa, which continued to appear until it was shut down by Sadat shortly before his assassination in October 1981.

In 1981, members of another offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, the Egyptian Islamic Jihad assassinated Egyptian President Anwar as Sadat. The assassination was followed by widespread suppression of the group.

The Brotherhood turned away from violence at least officially. It is unclear whether this renunciation refers only to a commitment to use democratic methods in Egypt, or whether the Muslim Brotherhood renounced violence in general. The Muslim Brotherhood became more active in civil society, winning control of several student unions and professional syndicates, and contesting parliamentary elections under stand-in party names. It is now the single largest opposition group in the Egyptian parliament.

Muslim Brotherhood and Jihad

A basic tenet of the movement is holy war, Jihad in the sense of Jihad bis Seif, struggle by the sword. Jihad means "struggle" literally, and refers to a holy struggle or holy war.  Some Muslims believe that it refers primarily to an inner spiritual struggle. Others believe that Jihad in the sense of war should be waged only against idolators or only against those who threaten Islam. Al-Banna however, was quite explicit in stating that Jihad was to be waged as a holy duty ("fard") to subdue any society that did not submit to Islam. (For al-Banna's definition of Jihad, see the article on Jihad). Likewise Sayyed Qutb was explicit that Jihad was not a defensive war, but a staged struggle to "liberate" all mankind.

The Muslim Brotherhood (Ikhwan) is in one way or another responsible for most of the Sunni terrorist fundamentalist groups. "New" groups formed either when the original group was suppressed and it was necessary to take another name, or because of personal difference or minor or major differences in tactics or theology, or by merger with other similar groups. The most famous such group today is probably Al-Qaeda, which resulted from a merger of Osama Bin Laden's followers with those of Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood activist Ayman Zawahiri and other groups.

Goals of the Muslim Brotherhood

The goals of the Muslim brotherhood are set forth in the "home page" of the group:

Main objectives

A huge tree of "sub-goals" branches from these main objectives which are derived from the Quran and the tradition of the prophet (pbuh) [3,4]:

    1- Building the Muslim individual: brother or sister with a strong body, high manners, cultured thought, ability to earn, strong faith, correct worship, conscious of time, of benefit to others, organized, and self-struggling character [3].

    2- Building the Muslim family: choosing a good wife (husband), educating children Islamically, and inviting other families.

    3- Building the Muslim society (thru building individuals and families) and addressing the problems of the society realistically.

    4- Building the Muslim state.

    5- Building the Khilafa (basically a shape of unity between the Islamic states).

    6- Mastering the world with Islam.

Source: http://www.mideastweb.org/Middle-East-Encyclopedia/muslim_brotherhood.htm


Iran

In its February 25, 2001 Report, the U.N. atomic watchdog has received new information regarding allegations that Iran may be seeking to develop a nuclear-armed missile.

The confidential document signalled the U.N. body's growing frustration at what it sees as Iran's lack of cooperation with a long-running investigation into its disputed nuclear program. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) report noted the following:

    * Contrary to Security Council resolutions, Iran has not suspended its uranium enrichment activities at several facilities, which are under IAEA safeguards. Enrichment activities have been expanded at both a pilot plant and the main plant at Natanz, and at an enrichment plant called Fordow, near the holy city of Qom. Tehran admitted the existence of the latter facility in 2009, days before it was revealed by U.S. and European surveillance. Indeed, Iran is enriching with more than 5,000 centrifuges, 1,000 more than three months ago. (A rare optimistic note is that Iran's total of 8,000 centrifuges is slightly less than the total at the time of the last report, suggesting breakdowns remain a problem.)

    * Iran has now produced more than 3,600 kilograms of low-enriched uranium; if processed into higher proportions of the fissile isotope U-235, this amount could theoretically be enough for several atomic bombs. In addition, Iran continues to enrich some of this to a higher (20 percent) proportion of U-235, a cause for concern because anything beyond is defined as highly enriched uranium (HEU). Iran is also working on two new centrifuge designs that might be more efficient than its problematic IR-1 centrifuge.

    * Iran is not responding to information requests about the Fordow plant and has yet to tell the IAEA anything about ten new centrifuge plants. Sites for five of these plants have already been chosen, and construction will begin on one of them before the Iranian new year (March 20) or shortly afterward.

    * Iran has provided no further information regarding its claim last year that it possessed laser enrichment technology, nor on its later announcement that it was developing a new type of centrifuge. The regime has also ignored IAEA requests about additional locations related to the manufacture of centrifuges and research and development on enrichment.

    * Although Iran has stated that it is not working on reprocessing -- which the IAEA confirmed, but only in the facilities it was permitted to inspect --the regime continues to work on heavy-water projects in violation of Security Council resolutions.

    * Some activities at the Isfahan uranium conversion and fuel manufacturing facilities contravene Iran's international obligations.
   
    * There is new information as well as concerns "about the possible existence in Iran...of activities related to the development of a nuclear payload for a missile." This disturbing conclusion reinforces previous evidence that Iran is working hard to design a nuclear weapon small enough to fit on top of a missile less than three feet in diameter. It also suggests that Iran intends to design an implosion-type device, which is more challenging than the gun-type design used in the Hiroshima bomb and later developed by apartheid-era South Africa. Nuclear devices for missiles must also be more durable than those dropped from aircraft because they need to cope with the huge acceleration and high re-entry temperatures associated with rocket launches.

The Report is available at http://isis-online.org/uploads/isis-reports/documents/IAEA_Iran_report_25Feb2011.pdf

Source: Simon Henderson, “New Evidence of Iran's Nuclear Ambitions”, PolicyWatch #1767, The Washington Institute (March 2, 2011).

Further information: http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/02/26/us-nuclear-iran-idUSTRE71O4RC20110226

http://iranprimer.usip.org/blog/2011/feb/25/un-reports-new-information-iran%E2%80%99s-nuclear-program


Yemen



It is quite predictable to assume that the next stone in this Arab domino unrest is Yemen. In another reverberation of the popular anger rocking the region, on February 2, 2011, the longtime president Ali Abdullah Saleh announced concessions that included suspending his campaign for constitutional changes that would allow him to remain president for life and pledging that his son would not seek to be his successor. The news came one day after Jordan's king dismissed his cabinet. "No extension, no inheritance, no resetting the clock," Saleh told Parliament the day before protesters planned a rally in Sana that they're calling a "day of rage." Saleh has ruled Yemen for 32 years and, despite the country being a haven for al Qaeda, has been considered a close American ally in the region.

See http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/03/world/middleeast/03yemen.html?_r=2&ref=global-home&om_rid=EI4aJV&om_mid=_BNSWFLB8YIC1at


Galant

Yoav Galant will not be the next Chief of Staff. For the first time in Israel’s history, a nomination to this position was cancelled after it was approved by the government. After the negative opinion of the State Comptroller, the Legal Advisor to the Government announced that he will not be able to defend Galant at the Supreme Court of Justice. Following this, Prime Minister Netanyahu and Minister of Defence Barak cancelled Galant’s nomination.



Galant said first he would appeal to the Supreme Court for assistance but after further reflection withdrew the appeal. I presume his legal advisors convinced him that he had little chance of winning.

Galant who served the country for 34 years will go home. I presume he will go to business. In the future, do not be surprised if Galant will seek a political or another public position.


Benny Gantz



On February 14, 2011, Major General Benny Gantz was appointed the 20th IDF Chief of Staff and received the rank of Lieutenant General. He was a compromise nomination after the Galant fiasco, one that both Netanyahu and Barak could agree upon quickly.

Gantz was born in 1959, recruited to the IDF in 1977 and joined the Paratroopers Brigade. In 1979, he graduated from the IDF Officer School and was positioned as a Platoon Commander and later as a deputy Company Commander in the Paratrooper Brigade. In the 1982 Lebanon War he replaced an injured company commander, fighting alongside his soldiers in western Beirut.

Between 1989-1992 he served as Commander of the Shaldag Unit in the Israel Air force. During the same period, was a commander of the forces securing operation Shlomo, bringing Ethiopian Jews to Israel.

Between 1994-1995 he served as Commander of the Judea Brigade in the Judea and Samaria Division.

Between 1998-1999 received the rank of Brig. Gen. and served as commander of a reserve division in the Northern Command.

Between 1999-2000 he served as Commander of the Liaison Unit with Lebanon. He was the last IDF commander to leave the gates of Lebanon.

In 2001 was appointed Commander of the Northern Command Reserve Core and received the rank of Maj. Gen.

Between 2000-2002, during the start of the second Intifada he served as Commander of the Judea and Samaria Division.

Between 2002-2005 he served as Commander of the IDF Northern Command.

Between 2005-2007 he served as Commander of the IDF Ground Forces Command.

Between 2007-2009 he served as the IDF Military Attaché in the United States.

Benny Gantz is a military man who identifies with the system. He is a hard working officer, a dedicated technocrat who will do the job quietly and skillfully. Gantz is a humble person, certainly far more humble than Barak and Galant. He is not a peacock and his leadership style is anything but uh aha charm. Gantz is very mamlachti and knows what is expected of him. He will not confront the political elite of Israel and will dedicate his energies to maintain a strong army. In many respects, Gantz reminds me of the 12th Chief of Staff, Moshe Levy (Moishe Vachetzi): Quiet, industrious, very focused, aware of his strengths and limitations, seeking harmonious working relationships with his generals and politicians. Gantz will not seek unnecessary adventures but he will have no hesitation to put to good use the might of the Israeli army if ordered by the government.

Sources:
http://idfspokesperson.com/2011/02/14/lt-gen-benny-gantz-appointed-20th-idf-chief-of-the-general-staff/
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/benny-gantz-becomes-idf-s-20th-chief-of-staff-1.343094
http://www.jpost.com/Defense/Article.aspx?id=208119


Post Chief of Staff Saga


Anyone who wishes to change the plan of her apartment in Israel knows how difficult and how bureaucratic it is to pass the via dolorosa of building permits, municipality registration, taxes and crazy requirements. Thus, if you wish to extend your home by adding 10 square meters, you need to take a long breath and ask yourself: Do I really want to do this? Many answer in the negative, preserving their health.

Think of the following: A person (A) plants trees. When someone wakes up and says: Wait a moment, this is public land, A’s answer is: But these trees are mine. I planted them. What will happen to my trees? You cannot simply uproot them. And trees are important in our tradition. One of our national songs is about not uprooting trees.

Nice scheme. I wonder how prevalent this scheme is in Israel, especially in Moshavim and kibbutzim. I presume the wheel was not invented recently. According to the State Comptroller and the Legal Advisor to the Government, Galant used his position for his land schemes, and he did it big.

I miss the modest public officials we had: Berl Katznelson, A.D. Gordon, David Ben-Gurion, Yitzhak Ben-Zvi and the last modest giant, Menachem Begin. These people led by example. They were true leaders who understood what example they should set for their people. Our present leaders entered public life to do first and foremost for themselves. Do people who serve in senior public positions really believe that the way they conduct their public life has nothing to do with the way they conducts their personal life? Business people can do for themselves, but for public officials the private and the public spheres are hard to separate. Lack of awareness to these small details shows anything but leadership.


Katsav, or apples may fall far away from trees

In my free speech seminars I used to show my students a film called Not A Love Story. This film is about the porn industry and I thought it was interesting because it gave voice to all relevant constituencies: The pornographers, the producers, those who enjoy porn, those working in the industry, feminists, religious people. Many years ago, while I was teaching at the University of Haifa, I was scheduled to be away during the week of our pornography studies. I rearranged the class for the following week, and while away I asked my research assistant to show my class the film. I did not make the showing obligatory, only for those students who were interested.



A few days after my return from abroad, during my office hours, there was a knock on my door. One of my free speech seminar students came to see me. He came to complain about the film. He found it too graphic and offensive. I said that its showing was not obligatory. The student’s answer was that he participated in the class, he wanted to be like all students, therefore he saw it necessary for himself to watch the movie. He thought that I should have warned them that the film’s content might be offensive.

The student was one of the few observant students in my classes. There were not many. I thought about what he said and concluded he was right. The following class I apologized before my students for failing to warn them about its content, that it might be offensive to some. I also asked to see the student in private, and apologized to him in person, pledging that for now on I will always provide future students with such warning prior to showing the film. I have been abiding by my promise since then.

That student was Moshe Katsav’s son. Apples may fall far from trees.


Jonathan Pollard

There are renewed voices in Israel, urging the Israeli government to appeal to the Obama administration to release from American jail the spy who worked for Israel. A few distinguished columnists were quick to write that what Pollard did was not so serious, he did not produce truly important information, and that the Americans also understand that it is time for Pollard to be freed.



It was a gross mistake to recruit Pollard to spy on Israel’s most important ally. During the decision-making process, the Hegelian Owl of Minerva went to sleep. Israel needs the US far more than US needs Israel. Betraying its trust showed little thinking not to mention prudence.

In 2008, I had meeting with senior FBI officials. The meetings concerned the fighting of terrorism and child pornography on the Internet. During one of my meetings, I cautiously raised the issue, whether Pollard paid the price and now can be released from jail. The FBI senior official, who was in a good mood up until that point, deleted his smile. In the coldest possible manner he answered: We do not like spies. Israel betrayed our trust. Pollard will rot in jail. There is nothing to discuss.

I never raised the issue again.


UK-Israel.com - New website and 2011 Directory


The Directory of UK-Israel Business Services was published for the first time last year to an enthusiastic welcome by business people and professionals in both countries. An extended and completely bi-lingual 2011 print edition is due on May 2011. It is preceded by a new dedicated website- www.uk-israel.com , already on air with the last (Hebrew only) edition materials.

To be included in the new edition, to offer editorial contributions and for further information please contact the publisher Ms. Inbal Peleg paprika.pro@gmail.com


The Herzliya Conference

has become one of the most important annual forums in Israel. I was asked to post two videos to promote internationally and I do this with pleasure.

http://tinyurl.com/6f7qadr
http://youtube.com/watch?v=8yLYt2hpqGg


My New Article

“Physician-Assisted Suicide – A Qualified Endorsement”, Amsterdam Law Forum, Vol. 3, No. 1 (2011), http://ojs.ubvu.vu.nl/alf/article/view/186/378.



Most people would like to continue living. Empirical research, done time and again, shows this very clearly. I have visited more than thirty hospitals in Israel, England, Canada, the United States, Australia, New Zealand, the Netherlands and Belgium. Most patients, even in the most dreadful conditions, opt to life. This is more so when patients are Catholic, Jews and Muslims. This is less so in the Netherlands and Flemish-Belgium. But the general picture is clear: We all possess a zeal for life. Therefore, whenever we are unclear about the patients’ wishes, the default position we should take is that the patients opt to life. Only a small minority of patients expressly wish to die. In this article, I first discuss who the patients who wish to die are. Then I speak of the role of the medical profession and whether they should help all who wish to die. I further emphasize the importance of comprehensive palliative care and voice my objection to euthanasia, insisting on a comprehensive system of checks and balances when we wish to come to the patient’s aid. My plea is confined to physician-assisted suicide, where the last act is done by the patient and where the control lies with the patient.


New Books

Alexander Yakobson and Amnon Rubinstein, Israel and the Family of Nations (London: Routledge, 2009).

Can Israel be both Jewish and truly democratic? How can a nation–state, which incorporates a large national minority with a distinct identity of its own be a state of all its citizens?

Written by two eminent Israeli scholars, a professor of constitutional law and a historian, Alexander Yakobson and Amnon Rubinstein are the first to treat Zionism and Israeli experience in light of other states’ experiences and in particular of newly established states that have undergone constitutional changes and wrestled with issues of minorities. Citing various European, constitutions and laws, the authors explore concept of a Jewish State and its various meanings in the light of international law, and the current norms of Human Rights as applied to other democratic societies compatible with liberal democratic norms and conclude that international reality does not accord with the concept which regards a modern, liberal democracy as a culturally "neutral" and a nationally colourless entity.

 

In light of the new political map in Israel and the prospect of future disengagement from the West Bank,Israel and the Family of Nations is essential reading for all those who wish to understand Israel’s future challenges.

http://www.routledge.com/books/details/9780415464413/

I thank Routledge for sending me a copy.


Movie of the Year


The King’s Speech

This photo captures the film: It is about a man who has to overcome his deep-seated fears, not so much because he wants to, but because he has to. He is helped by his devoted wife, and by a shadow; a person behind the scenes who prepares him for the task of being a king – the speech therapist.



Colin Firth and Geoffrey Rush play the leading roles. Both are superb as the king and his therapist. Helena Bonham-Carter is magnificent, as always. It is hard to think of a good British film in the last decade without her presence, and in the rare occasions that she is missing I always wonder why. The score is captivating. Tom Hooper did an excellent job at directing this drama, providing quite a few moving moments. David Siedler wrote a terrific screenplay with some memorable one-liners, “Because I have a Voice!!”.

This is the best film I have seen this year. You will enjoy every moment. And you will be sad when it is over. The best 118 min that you can spend in the cinema nowadays.

The film just won the Oscar for Best Film of the Year. Deservedly so.


Monthly Poems


A Farewell

Flow down, cold rivulet, to the sea,
Thy tribute wave deliver:
No more by thee my steps shall be,
For ever and for ever.

Flow, softly flow, by lawn and lea,
A rivulet then a river;
No where by thee my steps shall be,
For ever and for ever.

But here will sigh thine alder tree,
And here thine aspen shiver;
And here by thee will hum the bee,
For ever and for ever.

A thousand suns will stream on thee,
A thousand moons will quiver;
But not by thee my steps shall be,
For ever and for ever.



Alfred, Lord Tennyson

More poems from Alfred, Lord Tennyson


אמא אמא
מילים: עמוס אטינגר
לחן: משה וילנסקי
קיימים 2 ביצועים לשיר זה

אמא, אמא,
הירח שר לך, אמא,
לאורו אומר לך, אמא:
את איתי,
את איתי.
אם הרחקתי לכת, אמא,
הן תדעי, ארמונות מלכות אבנה לך,
מלכתי.

במרום כל כוכב
לך שולח מיכתב
ומצרף תו אל תו
ושושן של זהב פורח,
כדי שאת ליבך שוב ישמח.
ולכן, אם תשמעי קול מיתרים,
אז תדעי - בנייך, אמא, לך שרים

אמא, אמא...

מול פריחות בירוק,
מן הים העמוק
ובין דמע לצחוק
לך אשלח מרחוק איגרת,
כדי שתשמריה למזכרת.
ואם יום שוב תשמעי קול מיתרים
אז תדעי - בנייך, אמא, שוב חוזרים.

אמא, אמא...


Musical Moment



Jean Sibelius: Valse Triste
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9t0FBQ3xeVA


Light Side



Father Jackson, Rabbi Nachshon and Imam Muchamad are playing poker. They enjoy many hours of the game. A lot of money is on the table when the police burst into the room.

“Have you been gambling, Father?” asks the chief of police.

Father Jackson looks up to the ceiling and mumbles to himself: “Forgive me, Almighty, for what I am about to say”, then looks at the chief of police and answers: “No, Sir”.

“Have you been gambling, Rabbi?” asks the chief of police.

Rabbi Nachshon looks up to the ceiling and mumbles to himself: “Forgive me, Almighty, for what I am about to say”, then looks at the chief of police and answers: “No, Sir”.

“Have you been gambling, Imam?” asks the chief of police.

Imam Muhammad answers: “With whom?”


Peace and love.



Yours as ever,

Rafi

My last communications are available on http://almagor.blogspot.com/
Earlier posts at my home page: http://hcc.haifa.ac.il/~rca/

People wishing to subscribe to this Monthly Newsletter are welcome to e-mail me at r.cohen-almagor@hull.ac.uk

Follow me on Twitter at @almagor35

Friday, January 28, 2011

Politics – January 2011


It is hard to be a man. It is harder to be a woman in this Man's world. And if you have a confused sexuality, Oh Man/Woman...


Gilad is still in captivity. Veshavu banim legvulam.

    ~Raphael Cohen-Almagor


The top story in Israeli news this month was the conviction of former President Moshe Katsav of rape.


Reflections on December Newsletter
Gilad Shalit
President Moshe Katsav – A Rapist
Ehud Barak Resigned Labour
Galant – take 2
Settlement-building Boom
Ecuador Became the Fifth Latin American Country to Recognize Palestine
Iran Steps Up Arming Hezbullah against Israel
Arthur Rosett (Arthur July 5, 1934-January 4, 2011)
February 8 - "Safer Internet Day"
Yad Vashem Holocaust Archive Is Now Online
What is Israel Website
New Books
Tu BeShvat
Movie
Monthly Poem
The Most Watched YouTube Clip
Valentina Lisitsa Playing Für Elise
Light Side



Free Gilad Shalit. The government should invest in his release. It should be one of its top priorities. Veshavu banim legvulam.


Reflections on December Newsletter

Professor Art Hobson has been a loyal reader of my Blog since its inception in 2000. I know that he cares about peace and tranquility in the world. He has commented and written to that effect for many years. Here is part of what he had published in NWA Times on January 2, 2011:



Israel needs tough love from the U.S.


Despite major disagreements with some Israeli actions, the U.S. government and most Americans, including me, have supported Israel since its founding in 1949.  Israel continues receiving $3 billion annually in mostly military assistance from the U.S., amounting to one-third of all U.S. foreign aid.  Furthermore, U.S. diplomatic support has been crucial for Israel, with the U.S. often standing alone with Israel at the United Nations.  For example, during 1972-2006 the U.S. vetoed, by its single vote, 42 U.N. Security Council resolutions that were unfavorable to Israel.

But in light of recent events, it's time to question this policy.  Is it in America's interest?  Is it in the world's interest?  Is it even in Israel's interest?  I raise this last question because, in light of increasing Israeli obstinacy over their illegal (according to the International Court of Justice) settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, Israel appears to be its own worst enemy. At a White House news conference last March, the well-known author and reporter Helen Thomas asked the President's press secretary "How can the U.S. support Israel when it continues to violate international law?"  Sadly, this has become a good question.

For over forty years, Israel's settlements in the occupied territories have been an obstacle to peace.  Not only President Obama, but also the nine presidents before him, have opposed settlement construction.  The settlements, the checkpoints, the settler-only roads, and the illegal route of Israel's security barrier, make daily life impossible for Palestinians.

These days, it's Israel, more than Palestine, who is holding out on the peace process.  Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has gone so far as to state unilaterally that Palestinians are ready to end all historic claims, such as the right of return for those displaced from Israeli soil, once they establish their state in the lands Israel has occupied in the 1967 Mideast war.  But ironically, when Abbas appealed to Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu to halt settlement building in order to continue the peace process, the Israeli leader told him his own government would fall if he halted settlement activity because of opposition from settlers and their sympathizers.  This represents a sad failure of Israeli democracy.

The outlines of a rational peace agreement have been clear for years:  Israel must give up its settlements in return for the Palestinians giving up the right of return to their pre-1949 lands in present-day Israel.  Jerusalem must be shared, with West and East Jerusalem probably becoming the capitols of Israel and Palestine, respectively.  Some larger older Israeli settlements could be retained, by mutual agreement, in return for allowances for some Palestinians to return to their pre-1947 homes.

For the good of all concerned including Israel herself, Israel needs some tough love.  There's no reason why we should continue providing $3 billion in aid plus diplomatic cover to a nation that is harming U.S. interests.  We need to tell Israel that we can no longer provide either the aid or the cover unless they absolutely end all settlement activity permanently, and come to a reasonable agreement with the Palestinians.

--

Dear Rafi

Many thanks for your e mail of today's date enclosing the December, 2010 Politics. bulletin.

I found that it makes excellent reading and have enjoyed the humour you pump in from time to time. I agree with "Chrismess" which I do not relish because of its commercial aspect. I note the KLM AlItalia comments which I had experience of and lost many suitcases (at Schiphol) I even had two brand new suitcases replaced by KLM because mine where damaged, etc...

That is nothing compared with my adventures with EL AL I had problems with El AL when I was last at Lod where they had overbooked the New York flight via Heathrow (London) by 31 passengers. El AL asked for volunteers to agree to take the next plane to Heathrow/New York which was due to leave three hours later..The 30 passengers who volunteered and I, waited until 4am the following day (eight hours later!!!). In the meantime everyone was angry and when they discovered that I was a lawyer they ask me to be their spokesman. The airline refused to give us food and drink during the wait, refused us free telephone calls to those who were meeting us at Heathrow/New York airports and refused us accommodation. EL AL said that it was not their responsibility to feed and water us and accommodate us. The responsibility rested with Lod Airport authorities. When I approached Lod Airport Authorities I was told that the Manager was at home and that they could not do anything without his instructions. By that time it was 11pm in Israel. I insisted to talk with the airport manager and I got him out of bed and at the airport and after much argument and persuasion all the 31 of us got a meal including drinks of our choice and we were allowed to make telephone calls to those who were meeting us in London/New York.. Accommodation was not offered as we were told that the chartered aircraft which was to take us back was on its way and that it was not convenient (too expensive) to book us for a few hours in a hotel. I have never flown since with EL AL! Other bad airlines are Cyprus Airways, Air France, and Bulgarian Airways (which have now gone bust!) The best airlines I have ever flown with are Cathay Pacific, Malaysian Airlines and Lauder Air (Austrian Coy owned and run my the Austrian racing driver Lauder)

On the more serious matters the Mount Carmel fires were a tragedy and was surprised to read that Israel did not have the equipment to deal with these and had to rely on other countries for assistance. I note that Cyprus sent a plane amongst many other countries. It is gratifying that some Arab countries and Turkey also assisted at the moment of need. As for your article in Greek, I did not know that you are learned in that language. We must speak Greek next time we meet.

Thank you too for your festive season card which you sent me some days ago and to which I have not replied. I have been extremely busy recently - in fact extraordinarily so.

Thank you for the wise greetings  in your  e mail which I very much appreciate. I wish you and your family a happy festive season and may 2011 bring you joy and many rewards and much satisfaction in all you undertake.

Warmest greetings
Jo

Professor Jo Carby-Hall, University of Hull

--

As always, enjoy reading
Re this (with which I very much agree): I am working on the second edition of Freedom from Religion: Rights and National Security (will be released 2011), http://amzn.to/9fIlQI, and am ---literally---at the moment working (adding) material re the Rabbis/apts/Arabs etc. To call it a disgrace is to compliment. Worse is the NON action by Weinstein, Na'aman and what I believe to be mere lip service by Bibi.

Israel cannot sit idly by while senior officials incite to racism and undermine its democratic values. Such officials need to decide: either they are public servants who adhere to the laws and values of the state that employs them, or they incite to hate and violence. If they chose the latter, they should resign immediately. And if they do not see the necessity in doing so, then the state should discharge them from all public responsibilities. Israel as a Jewish state has an obligation to secure the well being of its vulnerable minority.

Amos N. Guiora
Professor of Law
University of Utah

--

Dear Rafi,

I have read with interest your latest Newsletter.
As ever, I have found it to be thought-provoking.
With your kind permission, just a few remarks:
Your analysis of Netanyahu -
Although I don't necessarily agree with everything you write, I must say that it is coherent and interesting.
I think that to compare Netanyahu with Begin is rather premature.
Your view of Begin is conveyed with the benefit of hindsight whereas your assessment of Netanyahu is not.

As a matter of fact, if one dwells dispassionately on Netanyahu's stance on the Israeli-Palestinian dispute, one can, in my opinion, reach the conclusion that some of his positions have changed in a manner that would have been difficult to imagine only two years ago: For instance, his Bar Ilan speech, in which, for the first time, he was ready to accept, in principle, the establishment of a Palestinian state. Indeed, even his policies have been modified in ways that are surprising, as his decision to freeze construction in Israeli settlements.

You might say that the first was a matter of public rhetoric, but the latter was a policy decision which he and his government implemented on the ground for nine months. No previous Israeli government, whether from the left or from the right, had ever undertaken a similar freeze.

Time is needed, in my view, to draw comparisons with previous Israeli prime ministers. Netanyahu, I think, ought to be assessed on the basis of facts, taking into account the circumstances within which he has to shape his government's policies - both domestic and international. A more nuanced, less deterministic, analysis of his policies, so far, are called for, in my opinion.

Your comments about the unilateral recognition by a few Latin American countries of a Palestinian state in the 1967 borders (the boundaries that preceded the Six Day War):

I would beg to differ with your conclusions: The United States, as other serious countries, cannot engage in virtual diplomatic games. The recognition extended by those South American countries is hardly serious as there is no Palestinian state in situ.

The comparison with Ben-Gurion's declaration of independence is incorrect, in my opinion.

Israel was recognized as a sovereign state only following Ben-Gurion's declaration, which came in the wake of the UN General Assembly's Partition vote of 29th of November, 1947. Indeed, Ben-Gurion's declaration of independence followed the clear-cut rejection by the Arab states and the leadership of the Palestinian Arabs of the UN Partition Plan and the subsequent attack on the Jewish population in Mandatory Palestine.

Today, the leadership of the Palestinian Arabs has a negotiating partner, which the leadership of the Jewish community in Mandatory Palestine did not back in 1947-1948.

The recognition extended by those South American countries is completely different, as it didn't follow any act of formal recognition by any international body such as the UN, or even a Palestinian declaration of independence.

A state that does not exist, has not been declared by anybody, has been recognized by some South American countries; and now you want the US to follow through? In my view, this would hardly be a serious diplomatic move by the US. The US is not known to engage in such acts of virtual diplomacy.

Incidentally, such acts of recognition only harden the position of the Palestinian Authority in believing that it can wait passively without doing much in terms of negotiating directly with Israel, let alone making some painful concessions in order to achieve the desired peace.

Thank you very much for your kind attention and patience in reading my comments on your interesting and thought-provoking Newsletter.

Best wishes.
Yoav
Dr. Yoav J. Tenenbaum
Tel Aviv University


Gilad Shalit

Gershon Baskin, co-CEO of the Israel/Palestine Center for Research and Information (www.ipcri.org), published in the Jerusalem Post a sad, poignant piece on why Gilad Shalit is still in captivity. The sad true is that Shalit is still in Hamas’ hands because no one wants to give Hamas a victory.

After four and half years, Shalit could have been home a long time ago; the price tag has been known for more than four years, and has not changed. Baskin personally received the first list of Hamas’s demands, which he passed on to the Prime Minister’s Office, and the price remains today as it was then – in fact, Hamas has made some compromises, but Shalit remains in captivity.


Gilad Shalit

Hamas indicated a willingness to conduct direct secret talks to conclude a deal. The Israeli response was: We have an agreed-upon mediator – a German former intelligence officer – and everything must go through him.

Egypt, which has provided the umbrella for the negotiations, has the Muslim Brotherhood to worry about. The recent elections there were a clear demonstration of the political manipulations the regime is willing to undertake to prevent any kind of political victory for Hamas’s elder brother.

Jordan, like Egypt, doesn’t want to see celebrations of Hamas’s success in bringing about the release of Palestinian prisoners.

Mahmoud Abbas and the Palestinian Authority work overtime to crush the influence of Hamas in the West Bank. Hundreds of prisoners released to Hamas is perceived as a direct threat to the Abbas regime.

The Americans don’t want a Hamas victory, and why should they care about a single IDF soldier anyway?

Ehud Barak certainly doesn’t want to be perceived as the man who gave in to Hamas.

Ehud Olmert didn’t want that either, even though his negotiator almost closed a deal.

Who in the government wants to gain the reputation of being soft on terror? Prime Minister Netanyahu has calculated the political costs of a deal and has concluded that “business as usual” is much better than paying the price to bring Shalit home.

There are no negotiations taking place. The German mediator, Dr. Gerhard Conrad, has basically stopped trying, knowing that the process is stuck almost where it was more than a year ago.

Egyptian security officials claim they could conclude a deal, but no one will appoint them to take full charge, and without that they will play only a passive role.

A senior Norwegian official who I tried to engage in mediation on a number of occasions, and was willing to do so says that while Hamas was willing for him to try, he had to coordinate with Egypt, which was not interested in someone else stepping in, and Israel simply refused.

In July 2010, a letter from a senior Hamas official was delivered to Conrad through a UN official in Gaza, after its contents had been authorized by Hamas strongman – and the person believed to be holding Shalit – Ahmed Jaabari, in which Hamas agreed to moderate some of its demands.

Baskin received a copy and delivered it to the prime minister and the minister of defense. Jaabari was willing to accept that a certain number of prisoners on the Hamas list would be removed, and that Hamas would agree that about 30 of the West Bank prisoners could be released to Gaza or sent abroad. Israel’s position was that more than 10 names on the Hamas list be removed entirely, and that more than 120 West Bank prisoners be expelled to Gaza or abroad.

On the basis of the letter and other indications, Conrad tried to renew the process, but came to a dead end on the Israeli side. Baskin recently spoke with that senior Hamas official, who continues to state that Jaabari is now willing to accept even more deportees to Gaza and abroad, but Israel continues to refuse to enter serious negotiations.

Source: Gershon Baskin, “Encountering Peace: The Forgotten Soldier”, The Jerusalem Post (January 3, 2011).


President Moshe Katsav – A Rapist


On December 30, 2010, the Tel Aviv District Court convicted former State President Moshe Katsav of two counts of rape and other sexual abuse charges, declaring that Katsav's version of events was "riddled with lies."

The verdict was handed down after a long legal battle which lasted more than four years. The allegations relate to his terms as tourism minister and as president of the country. Several women stepped forward with similar allegations that Katsav (butcher in Hebrew) exploited his authority to rape them and to demand sexual favours.

Katsav was convicted of raping and sexually assaulting a former employee, named A., from the Tourism Ministry. He was also convicted of sexually harassing another woman, H., from the President's Residence, of sexually abusing and harassing yet another woman L. from the President's Residence, and of obstructing justice.



According to presiding Court Judge, George Karra, Katsav tried to charm A, and when she did not respond to his overtures, he began to harass her. The defendant told the victim that he was in love with her, added Judge Karra, and left her feeling humiliated.
"We accept A.'s version of events that the humiliation stemmed from a single reason, that she refused to accept the defendant's sexual advances," said the judges.
"While the defense team called this a malicious plot born from A.'s desire to seek revenge against the accused for firing her, the prosecution brought forth a list of witnesses who testified to having hearing A.'s remarks over the course of time between when the event occurred and when the case broke open," said Karra. "These testimonies disqualify claims of slander," the judges rules. "All of these testimonies based on what A. said contradict the defendant's claims that this was an invention born from emotions."
The verdict read out by the panel of three judges - comprising Karra, Miriam Sokolov and Judith Shevach - was the first judicial statement on the veracity of allegations repeated, dissected and mulled over by Israeli media over four years.

Katsav appeared pale and wan, shaking his head with disbelief after the judges read out the verdict. His punishment is expected to be severe, as the maximum penalty for rape is 16 years, and the minimum four.


Ehud Barak Resigned Labour

After destroying the Labour Party, Defense Minister Ehud Barak is seeking new forums. He announced his decision to step down from his position as Labour Party chairman, following months of turmoil within the weakened faction.


Barak in a familiar pose; note the similarities between his pose and Netanyahu's

In the wake of waning support from his own party ministers, Barak announced the inception of a new faction of his own called Atzmaut (Independence). Four Labour colleagues - Agriculture Minister Shalom Simhon, Deputy Defense Minister Matan Vilnai, Deputy Industry, Trade and Labor Minister Orit Noked and Knesset Member Einat Wilf – joined their leader. Barak seeks independence from the party which served him well. I cannot say this was mutual.

Yet again, the person who is known in Israel as Ehud Barach (meaning “Ehud Run”) is running away from responsibility. A leader who leads by example. No wonder Barak is the least popular politician in Israel nowadays. You can fool some people sometimes, but you cannot fool them all the time.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was aware of the move and encouraged it; his associates at the Prime Minister's Office even helped Barak plan it. The number of breakaways is not enough to rob him of his parliamentary majority. Netanyahu's coalition currently has a majority, with 74 seats - including its Labour members - in the 120-seat Knesset. "The split will create an island of stability, a small and consolidated group within the coalition," said a source close to Netanyahu. Also remember, Kadima will always be happy to jump in if needed.

With talks stalled for more than three months, an increasing number of Labour members had urged Barak to pull out of the government because of the peace process impasse. Labour had been due to vote next month on whether to quit the right-wing coalition government over Netanyahu's wrecking of the peace process. Barak's move obviously pre-empts that decision. . Barak does not wish to depart the Ministry of Defence. He loves his job and the sense of power.

On the same day, January 17, 2011, three Laboor ministers - Social Affairs Minister Isaac Herzog Minority Affairs Minister Avishay Braverman and Trade, Industry and Labour Minister Benjamin Ben-Eliezer – quickly responded by resigning the government. The Labour's four remaining lawmakers, with whom Barak hardly spoke let alone consulted, are greatly relieved. Their duty is to revamp the party, consolidate it and move it forward with determination.

After intense negotiation day between Likud and Atzmaut, on January 18 the price was paid: Barak remains the defense minister; MK Shalom Simhon was appointed the new National Infrastructure Minister instead of resigning Labour minister Benjamin Ben-Eliezer; MK Matan Vilnai received the Minority Affairs portfolio instead of Avishay Braverman, and MK Orit Noked was appointed the new agriculture minister instead of Simhon. I hope not to see them in any future government. Let them enjoy what they have now and let it be their last achievement.

Sources: http://www.haaretz.com/misc/article-print-page/barak-quits-weakened-labor-to-form-own-party-1.337493?trailingPath=2.169,2.216,2.218,
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-12204321
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4014659,00.html


Galant – take 2

General Yoav Galant is yet again in the news and yet again for the wrong reasons. While apparently he had nothing to do with the infamous Galant Document that was designed to block his way to the Chief of Staff Office, this scandal is all about him and his behavior. Apparently, an army general can do almost everything he wants in Israel 2010. But he might not be able to do everything in 2011.

A report by the State Comptroller Micha Lindenstrauss concludes that Galant illegally took over public land that was not his near his home on Moshav Amikam. The report brings to light two main issues. The first is that Galant had signed an affidavit confirming an untrue statement with respect to his building permit. In addition, he illegally paved two paths leading to his 350 square meter house at the heart of 35 dunam of land. The second issue is that Galant had approached the Israel Lands Administration with a request to plant olive trees on land that he had supposedly cultivated. Galant had stated that the land in question had been cultivated for several years, but the report reveals that Galant had in fact not cultivated the land.



The Comptroller wrote that there is no question that Galant seized lands that were not his own. "Galant's version is that the mistake, which he admits to and apologized over, was actually his contractors' mistake, he had executed the planting on the land he received (8.649 acres) and continued planting an additional 6.9 acres by mistake. The blunder, which he claims was a bona fide error, is blamed on the planting, and claims he had no involvement in the issue".

The Comptroller also criticized the authorities involved in the affair. "Our findings show that there is a possibility that the various authorities acted with leniency in Galant's case, possibly because of his senior position".



This is Israel, not Saudi Arabia. Mansions such as Galant’s are not common. Even Israel’s wealthiest suburban communities, such as Kfar Shmaryahu and Herzliya Pituach, both north of Tel Aviv, are mostly made up of massive villas situated on relatively small plots of land. Galant’s castle is outrageous by Israeli standards. The alleged fact that he took the law into his hands to expropriate even more land is disgraceful.

The Green Movement submitted a petition to the High Court of Justice which called for disqualifying Galant as a candidate for IDF chief. The State Comptroller report does not answer the question whether Galant is qualified to serve as the new head of the IDF.

Legal Advisor to the Government, Yehuda Weinstein, is expected to decide by February 1 whether he will continue to defend Galant's appointment for IDF chief of staff or express support for the Green Movement petition. If he decides to continue advocating on Galant's behalf, it is unlikely that the court will intervene in the appointment.

Current Chief of Staff Gabi Ashkenazi was supposed to step down in February. He might need to remain in office for a little longer.

Sources: Tomer Zarchin, “State comptroller: Incoming IDF chief illegally took over public land”, Haaretz (January 27, 2011), http://www.haaretz.com/news/national/state-comptroller-incoming-idf-chief-illegally-took-over-public-land-1.339566; Aviad Glickman, “Comptroller: Galant seized public land” YNET (January 27, 2011), http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4020196,00.html; http://www.nrg.co.il/online/1/ART1/948/188.html; http://www.nrg.co.il/online/1/ART1/948/205.html?hp=1&cat=672; http://www.nrg.co.il/online/1/ART2/202/622.html?hp=1&cat=672

Settlement-building Boom

Worrying news from Israel. In the three months since Israel ended its settlement construction freeze in the West Bank,a settlement-building boom has begun, especially in more remote communities that are least likely to be part of Israel after any two-state peace deal. This means that if negotiations ever get back on track, there will be thousands more Israeli settlers who will have to relocate into Israel, posing new problems over how to accommodate them while creating a Palestinian state on the land where many of them are living now.

The NY Times reported that in addition to West Bank settlement building, construction for predominantly Jewish housing in East Jerusalem, where the Palestinians hope to make their future capital, has been rapidly growing after a break of half a year, with hundreds of units approved and thousands more planned.

Dror Etkes, an anti-settlement advocate who has spent the past nine years chronicling their growth, said he doubted whether there had been such a burst in settlement construction in at least a decade. Hagit Ofran, a settlement opponent who monitors their growth for Peace Now, said, “We can say firmly that this is the most active period in many years.” She said there were 2,000 housing units being built now and a total of 13,000 in the pipeline that did not require additional permits. In each of the past three years, about 3,000 units have been built.

While government data on the building will not be published until the new year, settler leaders did not contradict these assessments: “The freeze is over, and we are filling in the gap of need that was postponed,” said David Ha’Ivri, spokesman for the Samaria Regional Council in the northern West Bank. “The Peace Now numbers are reliable. Their count seems to be correct. The only difference is that they see it as negative, and we see it as positive.”

Naftali Bennett, executive director of the Yesha Council, the settlers’ umbrella organization, said he had information only on where there was a lack of building, not where there was construction in progress. He said his group wanted government tenders for an additional 4,000 badly needed units, mostly in large settlements.

Mark Regev, a spokesman for the Israeli prime minister said that since the 10-month building moratorium ended in September, the government had been sticking to building only in existing settlements and had not expropriated more land for settlements. The construction going on now, he said, “will not in any way change the final map of peace.”

Settlement opponents disagree, saying that the larger the settler population, the more resources — water, roads, security — will be needed for them and the harder it will be to get Israelis to agree to a Palestinian state. Moreover, much of the new building is deep in the West Bank.

In the West Bank, most of the building in recent years has been in large settlements relatively close to Israel that are widely expected to be annexed by Israel by swapping land elsewhere in a future deal. These include the large settlements of Maale Adumim, the Gush Etzion block, Beitar Illit and Modiin Illit.

Building in those areas generally requires government tenders, and those have been slower in coming lately. The intense recent growth has been more in private building, mostly in smaller and more remote settlements, places with names like Tapuach, Talmon, Ofra, Eli and Shiloh. A number of unauthorized outposts are also experiencing substantial growth. The Defense Ministry is in charge of all activity in the West Bank and has the authority to stop even private construction, although it may end up paying compensation.

The international community considers all settlement building in the lands won by Israel in the 1967 Middle East war, including East Jerusalem, to be illegitimate and illegal. Israel annexed East Jerusalem and does not consider building there to be an act of settlement. It argues that the West Bank is disputed, not occupied, and that building housing there for Israelis violates no international law.



There are more than 300,000 Israeli settlers in the West Bank and 200,000 Israeli Jews living in East Jerusalem, whom most of the world also considers settlers.

But within the Israeli legal system, settlements are regulated, while scores of small communities in the West Bank — known as outposts — have grown without regulation. Israel has vowed to take down many of those outposts, but it has not done so, largely to avoid the internal political confrontation that such a move would entail.

Since establishing any Palestinian state seems certain to involve moving tens of thousands of settlers into Israel, the more settlers there are, the harder such an establishment becomes, unless all the new settlers are within close-in blocks and the blocks become part of Israel.

Source: Ethan Bronner, “After Freeze, Settlement Building Booms in West Bank”, NY Times (December 22, 2010), http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/23/world/middleeast/23settle.html?_r=2&hpw&om_rid=EI4aJV&om_mid=_BNE08iB8WH2kYU


Ecuador Became the Fifth Latin American Country to Recognize Palestine

On December 24, 2010, Ecuador formally recognized Palestine as an independent state, following its neighbors Bolivia, Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay earlier this month.



President Rafael Correa signed "the Ecuadoran government's official recognition of Palestine as a free and independent state with 1967 borders".

Ecuador's decision, the ministry statement said, "vindicates the valid and legitimate desire of the Palestinian people for a free and independent state" and will be a key contribution to a negotiated peaceful coexistence in the Middle East.


Iran Steps Up Arming Hezbullah against Israel

Israeli and Western intelligence services have long been aware of Syrian and Iranian involvement in Hezbullah's arms buildup. Damascus Airport has been identified as the transit point for airlifts of Iranian arms that were subsequently transferred to Hezbullah via the open Syrian-Lebanese border, under the supervision of the Syrian security services.



A senior Pentagon official has divulged that Hezbullah has 50,000 rockets and missiles, including 40-50 Fatah 110 missiles and 10 SCUD-C ground-to-ground missiles.

Furthermore, some 10,000 Hezbullah fighters have been provided with a broad range of modern weapons, while the Iranian Revolutionary Guards have trained Hezbullah teams to operate these weapons.

According to Col. (ret.) Dr. Jacques Neriah, the Iranians exercise more control than ever over Hezbullah. Iranian General Hassan Madavi, Commander of the Lebanon Corps of the Revolutionary Guards, sits in Beirut alongside scores of Iranian officers and experts.

The Iranian intelligence services, operating in the framework of the Revolutionary Guards, have built many cells in Africa, most of which rely on Shiite emigrants from Lebanon. This is being undertaken in the framework of the African Division of the Jerusalem Corps of the Guards, an effort headed by Gen. Qassem Suleymani. After training in Iran, they serve as a nucleus for recruiting others and provide a base for Iranian intelligence activity in their countries.

In South Lebanon, with the assistance of the engineering units of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards, Hezbullah has dug tunnels that conceal its fighters from the watchful eye of Israeli UAVs that patrol the region. Hezbullah command centers were also equipped with an independent communications network funded by Iran.

Hezbullah also continues to conceal its war materiel in mosques, schools, fire stations, and the like. According to Israeli intelligence, at least 100 Lebanese villages have become genuine military bases.

Sourcehttp://www.jcpa.org/


Arthur Rosett (Arthur July 5, 1934-January 4, 2011)



I was saddened to hear of the death of Arthur whom I met upon my arrival at UCLA School of Law in 1999. Arthur was a kind man, a fine scholar, with a witty sense of humour and vast interest and knowledge in many spheres.

Arthur joined the UCLA School of Law faculty in 1967 and retired in 2003.  He had previously served as a law clerk to Justices Stanley Reed and Harold Burton, was an Assistant U.S. Attorney, practiced at Patterson, Belknap & Webb, became Associate Director of the President's Commission on Law Enforcement (The National Crime Commission), and participated as a research associate on the ALI Model Penal Code.  As a scholar and teacher, Professor Rosett was a vital part of our law school community for over three decades.  His scholarly work spanned a wide range of subjects that included Chinese law, contracts,  commercial law, comparative law, religious legal systems, and the careers of the judiciary.   His books include Contract Law and Its Application (6th ed., co-authored with Professor Daniel J. Bussel, 1999); A Living Tree: The Roots and Growth of Jewish Law (with Elliot Dorff, 1988); and The Judicial Career in the United States and Its Influence on the Substance of American Law (Rome:  Consiglio Nazionale delle Richere and the University of Rome, La Sapienza, 1992).  Arthur taught courses in Contracts, International Business Transactions, International Litigation and Dispute Resolution, Religious Legal Systems, as well as comparative law seminars, such as Japanese Law and International Commercial Law.

Arthur's professional activities were was as rich and varied as his scholarship.  He played a significant role in promoting intellectual exchange in international programs within the university and in the law school.  In the 1980’s, Arthur revitalized our graduate program.  In particular, he administered, taught, and mentored the students in that program, matching them with appropriate faculty advisers and watching over their progress.  In addition, he facilitated faculty exchange visits to China, Latin America and Europe.  Arthur chaired the law school’s Graduate and Visiting Scholars Program and the Japanese Law research and curriculum workshops for several years.  He also served on the faculty advisory committees for the UCLA Center for Pacific Rim Studies, UCLA Latin American Center, UCLA’s Program in Mexico, and the Japan Exchange and Research Program.

In the broader community, Arthur’s extensive professional activities included serving on the board of directors of the Center for International Commercial Arbitration, on the panels that arbitrate disputes involving the Director's Guild of America, and on the board of editors of the American Journal of Comparative Law and the Journal of Psychiatry and the Law.  He was an elected life member of the American Law Institute, and for the 1996-97 academic year, he was selected for the Fulbright Distinguished Chair in Comparative Law at Trento, Italy.

Please join me in extending my deep condolences to his wife, Rhonda Lawrence, and their family, David, Martha and Danny Rosett. 

See also http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/latimes/obituary.aspx?n=arthur-rosett&pid=147606960


February 8 - "Safer Internet Day"

To denote the day, may I recommend to you and your families Internet in the Family V 2.0: A guide to helping children when they go online. The guide offers advice to parents for creating a family code of conduct and about how to help children learn to search the Internet, how to determine the credibility of information, why students shouldn't 'copy and paste' Internet material into their own schoolwork, how to avoid the dangers posed by undesirable sites offering pornography and worse, and how to conduct themselves in contact with others online.



The new version adds sections on social networks, cyberbullying and newspaper online news, plus, with the cooperation of Microsoft, 20  "BE A SH@RK ON THE INTERNET" tips in short, Twitter-style that newspapers can use for a youth sticker contest.



http://www.wan-press.org/nie/articles.php?id=2300


Yad Vashem Holocaust Archive Is Now Online

Around 130,000 images from the world's largest Holocaust collection have been made available online for the first time in a bid to make them more accessible to people across the world. The newly scanned images help to reach new audiences, including young people around the world, enabling them to be active in the discussion about the Holocaust.

Yad Vashem hopes that the project will help people across the world research the murders of millions of people deemed undesirable by the Nazi regime. Yad Vashem's library holds more than 130 million documents and this move is the "first step" towards bringing the whole of the "vast" archive online. The 130,000 pictures made available now show the faces of thousands of Jews, young and old who suffered Nazi persecution and murder before and during the Second World War.



The ongoing project has been aided by internet giant Google. The company is providing technical assistance to the museum and is also hosting the archive via its Google Storage service. Google's experimental optical character recognition (OCR) technology, also used to translate images into digitally legible text by its Goggles application, has been employed in the digitisation project. A spokesman said that, "while not perfect, it will make it possible to search and find specific photographs and other documents".

The release marks International Holocaust Remembrance Day. Yad Vashem, set up in 1953, holds millions of testimonies, photographs, diaries, and other documentary material relating to the Holocaust.

The collections are visible at http://collections.yadvashem.org/photosarchive/en-us/photos.html

Source: “Yad Vashem Holocaust archive now available online”, http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/art/news/yad-vashem-holocaust-archive-now-available-online-2195235.html


What is Israel Website

Thanks to Bertha Skladman I became aware of a beautiful website about Israel, yes yet another one. The beauty of this site is that it provides a panoramic view of some of its scenic views, a brief introduction to the beauty of the country and why it should be on the radar of tourists.


http://www.aboutisrael.co.il/heb/freepage.php?id=997


New Books

James M. Lutz and Brenda J. Lutz, Global Terrorism (London: Routledge, 2009).



This is the 2nd edition of a most useful resource about modern terrorism. It provides a comprehensive introduction to terrorism as a global phenomenon, analyzing the history, politics, ideologies and strategies of both contemporary and older terrorist groups.

Written in a clear and accessible style, each chapter explains a different aspect of terrorism and illustrates this with a wide variety of detailed case studies from across the world. Although the focus is on the contemporary, the book also includes discussion of older terrorist groups.

This edition includes new material on:

  • July 7 attacks in London
  • Bali bombings
  • domestic terrorism in Columbia
  • attacks in Iraq
  • Al Qaeda, the Tamil Tigers, the IRA
  • animal rights extremism

The unique combination of a genuinely historical focus and truly global coverage makes this an ideal introductory textbook for anyone studying terrorism.


http://www.flipkart.com/global-terrorism-james-lutz-brenda-book-0415772478

I thank Routledge for a copy of this important book.


Tu BeShvat

On January 20 we celebrate Tu BeShvat, the "New Year of the Trees". We eat dry fruit and thank for the fruit, shade and beauty of nature.




Trees

1 I think that I shall never see
2 A poem as lovely as a tree.

3 A tree whose hungry mouth is prest
4 Against the earth's sweet flowing breast;

5 A tree that looks at God all day,
6 And lifts her leafy arms to pray;

7 A tree that may in Summer wear
8 A nest of robins in her hair;

9 Upon whose bosom snow has lain;
10 Who intimately lives with rain.

11 Poems are made by fools like me,
12 But only God can make a tree.

Joyce Kilmer

More poems from Joyce Kilmer


Monthly Poem

A Familiar Letter

YES, write, if you want to, there's nothing like trying;
Who knows what a treasure your casket may hold?
I'll show you that rhyming's as easy as lying,
If you'll listen to me while the art I unfold.

Here's a book full of words; one can choose as he fancies,
As a painter his tint, as a workman his tool;
Just think! all the poems and plays and romances
Were drawn out of this, like the fish from a pool!

You can wander at will through its syllabled mazes,
And take all you want, not a copper they cost,--
What is there to hinder your picking out phrases
For an epic as clever as "Paradise Lost"?

Don't mind if the index of sense is at zero,
Use words that run smoothly, whatever they mean;
Leander and Lilian and Lillibullero
Are much the same thing in the rhyming machine.

There are words so delicious their sweetness will smother
That boarding-school flavor of which we're afraid,
There is "lush"is a good one, and "swirl" is another,--
Put both in one stanza, its fortune is made.

With musical murmurs and rhythmical closes
You can cheat us of smiles when you've nothing to tell
You hand us a nosegay of milliner's roses,
And we cry with delight, "Oh, how sweet they do smell!"

Perhaps you will answer all needful conditions
For winning the laurels to which you aspire,
By docking the tails of the two prepositions
I' the style o' the bards you so greatly admire.

As for subjects of verse, they are only too plenty
For ringing the changes on metrical chimes;
A maiden, a moonbeam, a lover of twenty
Have filled that great basket with bushels of rhymes.

Let me show you a picture--'t is far from irrelevant--
By a famous old hand in the arts of design;
'T is only a photographed sketch of an elephant,--
The name of the draughtsman was Rembrandt of Rhine.

How easy! no troublesome colors to lay on,
It can't have fatigued him,-- no, not in the least,--
A dash here and there with a haphazard crayon,
And there stands the wrinkled-skinned, baggy-limbed beast.

Just so with your verse,-- 't is as easy as sketching,--
You can reel off a song without knitting your brow,
As lightly as Rembrandt a drawing or etching;
It is nothing at all, if you only know how.

Well; imagine you've printed your volume of verses:
Your forehead is wreathed with the garland of fame,
Your poems the eloquent school-boy rehearses,
Her album the school-girl presents for your name;

Each morning the post brings you autograph letters;
You'll answer them promptly,-- an hour isn't much
For the honor of sharing a page with your betters,
With magistrates, members of Congress, and such.

Of course you're delighted to serve the committees
That come with requests from the country all round,
You would grace the occasion with poems and ditties
When they've got a new schoolhouse, or poorhouse, or pound.

With a hymn for the saints and a song for the sinners,
You go and are welcome wherever you please;
You're a privileged guest at all manner of dinners,
You've a seat on the platform among the grandees.

At length your mere presence becomes a sensation,
Your cup of enjoyment is filled to its brim
With the pleasure Horatian of digitmonstration,
As the whisper runs round of "That's he!" or "That's him!"

But remember, O dealer in phrases sonorous,
So daintily chosen, so tunefully matched,
Though you soar with the wings of the cherubim o'er us,
The ovum was human from which you were hatched.

No will of your own with its puny compulsion
Can summon the spirit that quickens the lyre;
It comes, if at all, like the Sibyl's convulsion
And touches the brain with a finger of fire.

So perhaps, after all, it's as well to the quiet
If you've nothing you think is worth saying in prose,
As to furnish a meal of their cannibal diet
To the critics, by publishing, as you propose.

But it's all of no use, and I'm sorry I've written,--
I shall see your thin volume some day on my shelf;
For the rhyming tarantula surely has bitten,
And music must cure you, so pipe it yourself.

Oliver Wendell Holmes



More poems from Oliver Wendell Holmes


The Most Watched YouTube Clip

In 2006, Judson Laipply uploaded "The Evolution of Dance," a six-minute mashup of 50 years of dance crazes. It became the most popular clip in YouTube history, with more than 157 million views.



Enjoy Evolution of Dance - By Judson Laipply, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dMH0bHeiRNg


Valentina Lisitsa Playing Für Elise



Valentina Lisitsa is known for her dazzling piano performances, rapid pace and powerful performances. Her critics found her sometimes too loud, and too rapid. I’d like to share with you one small piece in which Lisitsa expresses her utmost sensitivity playing Beethoven "Für Elise". Enjoy!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yAsDLGjMhFI&feature=channel


Light Side

A note on a toilet door of a well-respected high-tech company in Israel:

How come respected people -- engineers, researchers, computers wiz, the cream of the cream, who are able to direct a missile in stormy weather to a moving target at night, miles away from the launching place and hit it with great precision; how come these same people are unable to direct their wee and hit the target from one meter?



Peace and love.
Yours as ever,

Rafi

My last communications are available on http://almagor.blogspot.com/
Earlier posts at my home page: http://hcc.haifa.ac.il/~rca/

People wishing to subscribe to this Monthly Newsletter are welcome to e-mail me at r.cohen-almagor@hull.ac.uk

Follow me on Twitter at @almagor35